Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimizing Diagnostic and Staging Pathways for Suspected Lung Cancer: A Decision Analysis.
Vakil, Erik; Jackson, Nsikak; Sainz-Zuñega, Paula V; Molina, Sofia; Martinez-Zayas, Gabriella; Cantor, Scott B; Grosu, Horiana B; Casal, Roberto F; Ost, David E.
Affiliation
  • Vakil E; Division of Respirology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
  • Jackson N; Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • Sainz-Zuñega PV; School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, NL, Mexico.
  • Molina S; School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, NL, Mexico.
  • Martinez-Zayas G; School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, NL, Mexico.
  • Cantor SB; Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • Grosu HB; Department of Pulmonary Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • Casal RF; Department of Pulmonary Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • Ost DE; Department of Pulmonary Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. Electronic address: dost@mdanderson.org.
Chest ; 160(6): 2304-2323, 2021 12.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34256049
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The optimal diagnostic and staging strategy for patients with suspected lung cancer is not known. RESEARCH QUESTION What diagnostic and staging strategies are most cost-effective for lung cancer? STUDY DESIGN AND

METHODS:

A decision model was developed by using a hypothetical patient with a high probability of lung cancer. Sixteen unique permutations of bronchoscopy with fluoroscopy, radial endobronchial ultrasound, electromagnetic navigation, convex endobronchial ultrasound with or without rapid-onsite evaluation (ROSE), CT-guided biopsy (CTBx), and surgery were evaluated. Outcomes included cost, complications, mortality, time to complete the evaluation, rate of undetected N2-3 disease at surgery, incremental cost-complication ratio, and willingness-to-pay thresholds. Sensitivity analyses were performed on primary outcomes.

RESULTS:

For a peripheral lung lesion and radiographic N0 disease, the best bronchoscopy strategy costs $1,694 more than the best CTBx strategy but resulted in fewer complications (risk difference, 14%). The additional cost of bronchoscopy to avoid one complication from a CTBx strategy was $12,037. The cost and cumulative complications of bronchoscopy strategies increased compared with CTBx strategies for small lesions. The cost and cumulative complications of bronchoscopy strategies decreased compared with CTBx strategies when a bronchus sign was present, but bronchoscopy remained more costly overall. For a central lesion and/or radiographic N1-3 disease, convex endobronchial ultrasound with ROSE followed by lung biopsy with incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, if required, was more cost-effective than any CTBx strategy across all outcomes. Strategies with ROSE were always more cost-effective than those without, irrespective of scenario. Trade-offs also exist between different bronchoscopy strategies, and optimal choices depend on the value placed on individual outcomes and willingness-to-pay.

INTERPRETATION:

The most cost-effective strategies depend on nodal stage, lesion location, type of peripheral bronchoscopic biopsy, and the use of ROSE. For most clinical scenarios, many strategies can be eliminated, and trade-offs between the remaining competitive strategies can be quantified.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Decision Trees / Lung Neoplasms Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Chest Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canadá

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Decision Trees / Lung Neoplasms Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Chest Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canadá