Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Can we still use X-rays to predict contralateral slip in primary unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis?
Kwiatkowska, Magdalena; Kwiatkowski, Marcin; Czubak-Wrzosek, Maria; Czubak, Jaroslaw; Tyrakowski, Marcin.
Affiliation
  • Kwiatkowska M; Department of Orthopedics, Pediatric Orthopedics and Traumatology, The Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education in Warsaw.
  • Kwiatkowski M; Department of Orthopedics, Pediatric Orthopedics and Traumatology, The Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education in Warsaw.
  • Czubak-Wrzosek M; Department of Spine Disorders and Orthopaedics, The Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education in Warsaw, Gruca Orthopaedic and Trauma Teaching Hospital, Otwock, Poland.
  • Czubak J; Department of Orthopedics, Pediatric Orthopedics and Traumatology, The Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education in Warsaw.
  • Tyrakowski M; Department of Spine Disorders and Orthopaedics, The Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education in Warsaw, Gruca Orthopaedic and Trauma Teaching Hospital, Otwock, Poland.
J Pediatr Orthop B ; 32(3): 247-252, 2023 May 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34456288
The objective of this study was to assess subsequent contralateral slip (SCS) in the unaffected hip in patients with primary unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) using three radiographic parameters: posterior sloping angle (PSA), center-edge angle (CEA) and triradiate cartilage (TC) appearance. A total of 152 patients admitted to two pediatric units between 2001 and 2015 were divided into three groups: A - underwent prophylactic fixation of the unaffected hip at the time of index surgery- high clinical risk of SCS; B - no clinical risk factors but SCS occurred; C - no issues regarding the contralateral hip during follow-up. The mean PSA for groups A, B and C were 22°(6-49), 17°(9-24) and 13°(0-27), respectively. PSA was significantly higher in Group A than in Group C ( P < 0.0001). The differences in PSA between groups A and B, but also B and C were insignificant ( P = 0.12 and p=0.21, respectively). The mean CEA in groups A, B and C was 33(25-43), 35(26-42) and 37(17-53), respectively. CEA did not differ significantly between groups A, B and C ( P = 0.25). Assessment of TC did not differ significantly between the groups ( P = 0.66). Observation of TC in groups B and C combined revealed that the cartilage was open in 65% of 77 patients and 14% of them developed SCS; whereas among the 35% of patients with ossified TC only 7% developed SCS (OR=2.0). PSA and CEA alone have no predictive value in determining the risk of contralateral slip. The absence of TC results in a two-fold decrease in the likelihood of developing an SCS. The decision of prophylactic surgical treatment of the contralateral hip in primary unilateral SCFE should not be based solely on radiographic findings.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphyses Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Child / Humans Language: En Journal: J Pediatr Orthop B Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA / PEDIATRIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article Country of publication: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphyses Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Child / Humans Language: En Journal: J Pediatr Orthop B Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA / PEDIATRIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article Country of publication: Estados Unidos