Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of the Water Sorption and Solubility Behavior of Different Polymeric Luting Materials.
Labban, Nawaf; AlSheikh, Rasha; Lund, Melvin; Matis, Bruce A; Moore, B Keith; Cochran, Michael A; Platt, Jeffrey A.
Affiliation
  • Labban N; Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia.
  • AlSheikh R; Department of Restorative Dental Science, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahan Bin Faisal University, Dammam 34212, Saudi Arabia.
  • Lund M; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
  • Matis BA; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
  • Moore BK; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
  • Cochran MA; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
  • Platt JA; Department of Biomedical Sciences and Comprehensive Care, Division of Dental Materials, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Polymers (Basel) ; 13(17)2021 Aug 25.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34502891
ABSTRACT

Objective:

The study evaluated the water sorption (WSP) and water solubility (WSL) characteristics of different luting agents over a 180-day water storage period. Materials and

Methods:

Nine luting materials, i.e., conventional resin cement Panavia F (PF), Rely X ARC (RA), self-adhesive resin cement Rely X Unicem (RU), Breez (BZ), Maxcem Elite (MX), BisCem (BC) and resin-modified glass ionomer cement FujiCem (FC), FujiPlus (FP) Rely X luting plus (RL) were assessed and fifty-two-disc specimens of each material were fabricated. All specimens were desiccated until a constant weight (W0) was reached. Thirteen specimens for each luting material were then randomly assigned to one of the four water immersion periods (7, 30, 90, and 180 days). After each period, the specimens were removed from the water and weighed to get W1. The samples were again desiccated for a second time and W2 was measured. Both WSP and WSL were determined by the following equations WSP (%) = (W1 - W2) × 100/W0 and WSL (%) = (W0 - W2) × 100/W0. Assessments were performed following ISO standards. ANOVA was used to assess the effect of luting agent and time period on water sorption and solubility. Pair-wise comparisons were adjusted using Tukey's multiple comparison procedure. A significance level of 0.05 was used for all statistical tests.

Results:

The highest mean WSP and WSL (WSP/WSL) were demonstrated by resin-modified glass-ionomers (RL 18.32/3.25, FC 17.08/4.83, and FP 14.14/1.99), while resin luting agents showed lower WSP and WSL results (PF 1.6/0.67 and RA 1.76/0.46), respectively. The self-adhesive agents exhibited a wide range of WSP and WSL values (RU 1.86/0.13, BZ 4.66/0.93, and MX 3.68/1.11). Self-adhesive cement showed lower WSP and WSL compared with the resin-modified glass-ionomers (p < 0.05). All the materials reached equilibrium after 90-days.

Conclusions:

Resin-based luting materials have the lowest sorption and solubility. Rely X Unicem self-adhesive luting materials were comparable to resin luting materials for WSL and WSP. Resin-modified glass-ionomer showed the highest water sorption and solubility compared with both resin and self-adhesive materials.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Polymers (Basel) Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Arabia Saudita Publication country: CH / SUIZA / SUÍÇA / SWITZERLAND

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Polymers (Basel) Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Arabia Saudita Publication country: CH / SUIZA / SUÍÇA / SWITZERLAND