Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Low Literacy, Multimedia Health Information Technology Intervention to Enhance Patient-Centered Cancer Care in Safety Net Settings Increased Cancer Knowledge in a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Peipert, John D; Lad, Thomas; Khosla, Pam G; Garcia, Sofia F; Hahn, Elizabeth A.
Affiliation
  • Peipert JD; Department of Medical Social Sciences, 12244Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Lad T; John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Khosla PG; Mount Sinai Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Garcia SF; Department of Medical Social Sciences and Center for Patient-Centered Outcomes, 12244Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Hahn EA; Department of Medical Social Sciences and Center for Patient-Centered Outcomes, 12244Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Cancer Control ; 28: 10732748211036783, 2021.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34565193
ABSTRACT
We tested whether a low-literacy-friendly, multimedia information and assessment system used in daily clinical practice enhanced patient-centered care and improved patient outcomes. This was a prospective, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial with 2 arms, CancerHelp-Talking Touchscreen (CancerHelp-TT) versus control, among adults with Stage I-III breast or colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy in safety net settings. Each patient was assessed for outcomes at 4 timepoints after starting treatment (baseline), during treatment, immediately after treatment, and at follow-up assessment. The primary outcomes were health beliefs, cancer knowledge, self-efficacy, and satisfaction with communication about cancer and its treatments. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) was a secondary outcome. A total of 129 patients participated in the study (65 intervention and 64 control), and approximately 50% of these completed the study. Patients randomized to receive the CancerHelp-TT program had a significantly larger increase in their cancer knowledge in comparison to those randomized to the control arm (effect size = .48, P = .05). While effect sizes for differences between randomized groups in self-efficacy, health beliefs, HRQOL, and satisfaction with communication were small (.10-.48), there was a consistent trend that participants in the intervention group showed larger increases over time in all outcomes compared to the control group. The CancerHelp-TT software was favorably rated by intervention participants. The CancerHelp-TT program showed promise to increase vulnerable cancer patients' cancer knowledge and adaptive health beliefs and attitudes. However, vulnerable patients may need additional interventional support in settings outside cancer clinics.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breast Neoplasms / Colorectal Neoplasms / Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice / Patient Education as Topic / Health Literacy Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Cancer Control Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breast Neoplasms / Colorectal Neoplasms / Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice / Patient Education as Topic / Health Literacy Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Cancer Control Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos
...