Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Maxillary molar root and canal morphology of Neolithic and modern Chinese.
Ren, H Y; Kum, K Y; Zhao, Y S; Yoo, Y J; Jeong, J S; Perinpanayagam, Hiran; Wang, X Y; Li, G J; Wang, F; Fang, H; Gu, Y.
Affiliation
  • Ren HY; School and Hospital of Stomatology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University & Shandong Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration & Shandong Engineering Laboratory for Dental Materials and Oral Tissue Regeneration, Shandong Province, PR China.
  • Kum KY; Department of Conservative Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, National Dental Care Center for Persons with Special Needs, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, Seoul National University School of Dentistry, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Zhao YS; Institute of Cultural and Heritage, Shandong University, Qingdao, PR China.
  • Yoo YJ; Department of Conservative Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, National Dental Care Center for Persons with Special Needs, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, Seoul National University School of Dentistry, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Jeong JS; School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Shandong Province, PR China.
  • Perinpanayagam H; Division of Restorative Dentistry, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
  • Wang XY; Department of Endodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University & Shandong Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration & Shandong Engineering Laboratory for Dental Materials and Oral Tissue Regeneration, Shandong Province, PR China.
  • Li GJ; Department of Radiology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University & Shandong Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration & Shandong Engineering Laboratory for Dental Materials and Oral Tissue Regeneration, Shandong Province, PR China.
  • Wang F; Department of Radiology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University & Shandong Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration & Shandong Engineering Laboratory for Dental Materials and Oral Tissue Regeneration, Shandong Province, PR China.
  • Fang H; School of History and Culture, Shandong University, Jinan, PR China.
  • Gu Y; Department of Endodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University & Shandong Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration & Shandong Engineering Laboratory for Dental Materials and Oral Tissue Regeneration, Shandong Province, PR China. Electronic a
Arch Oral Biol ; 131: 105272, 2021 Nov.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34600333
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This study aimed to characterize Neolithic human maxillary molars from archeological remains at the Jiaojia site, Shandong, China, and compare their ultrastructural features with sex and age-matched modern locals.

DESIGN:

Maxillary first (n = 86) and second (n = 80) molars in 5000-year-old individuals (n = 50) from the Jiaojia site were scanned by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Sex and age-matched control groups were assigned from oral surgical patients at Shandong University. Images were analyzed for crown size, root length, root morphology, canal inter-orifice distances, mesiobuccal canal morphology, and second mesiobuccal (MB2) canal prevalence and location. Neolithic and modern values were compared statistically using Chi-squared and Mann-Whitney test at p < .05.

RESULTS:

Crown and root size were smaller, and canal inter-orifice distances were shorter in Neolithic maxillary molars than their modern counterparts. For mesiobuccal roots, Weine's Type I single canals were the most prevalent in Neolithic and modern first and second molars. MB2 canal prevalence were not significantly different (p > .05) in Neolithic (53.3%) or modern (60.5%) first molars, and Neolithic (11.3%) or modern (21.3%) second molars. But, MB2 prevalence was significantly higher for modern than ancient male first (p = .032) and second (p = .005) molars. Additionally, MB2 were located more mesially and closer to MB1 in Neolithic than modern molars.

CONCLUSIONS:

Maxillary molar root and canal morphology of ancient 5000-year-old remains at the Jiaojia site resemble that of local patients. A trend towards larger tooth size, and more dispersed MB2 canals over this short evolutionary period warrants additional investigation.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Tooth Root / Molar Type of study: Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: Arch Oral Biol Year: 2021 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Tooth Root / Molar Type of study: Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: Arch Oral Biol Year: 2021 Document type: Article