Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Real-Time Analysis of Antiproliferative Effects of Mouthwashes Containing Alcohol, Sodium Fluoride, Cetylpyridinium Chloride, and Chlorhexidine In Vitro.
Ülker, Mustafa; Çelik, A C Tutku; Yavuz, Emine; Kahvecioglu, Firdevs; Ülker, H Esra.
Affiliation
  • Ülker M; Medicana Konya Hospital, Konya, Turkey.
  • Çelik ACT; Private Celik Oral and Health Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Yavuz E; Advanced Technology Research and Application Center, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.
  • Kahvecioglu F; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.
  • Ülker HE; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.
Biomed Res Int ; 2021: 2610122, 2021.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34676260
OBJECTIVES: In this study, the cytotoxic responses of six different over-the-counter mouthwashes on L929 cells were analyzed by two different techniques: the traditional colorimetric tetrazolium-based reduction assay (MTT) and the modern impedance-based real-time cell analysis (RTCA) system to investigate their biocompatibility in vitro. Thus, the investigation of the antiproliferative effects of the specified materials via different techniques is vital to reach this goal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: First, L929 mouse fibroblasts were exposed to the dilutions of mouthwashes for 2 minutes. After incubation, the tetrazolium reduction method was used to assess the metabolic viability of cells measured by colorimetric MTT assay and morphological inspection of cells was performed via phase-contrast microscopy. Furthermore, the effect of each mouthwash on the proliferation, morphology, and adhesion of L929 cells was monitored continuously by a noninvasive and label-free RTCA system for 140 h. RESULTS: Our data showed that all of the mouthwashes had varying cytotoxic effects on fibroblasts compared to the control group in MTT assay. In addition to that, RTCA technology has provided the growth kinetic profiles that can be used to analyze if the treatment is causing antimitotic or DNA-damaging effect on cells. Thus, analysis via this system can tell us the mechanism of toxicity behind the cell growth inhibition in vitro. Here, we found that only mouthwash 1 moderately maintained the viability of the L929 cells, yet displaying antimitotic effects and the other mouthwashes (mouthwash 2-mouthwash 6) showed toxicity via DNA-damaging effects. CONCLUSIONS: Of the six types of mouthwash tested, the most biocompatible result was obtained from a mouthwash containing alcohol (i.e., mouthwash 1). On the other hand, sodium fluoride- (NaF-) and cetylpyridinium chloride- (CPC-) containing mouthwash (i.e., mouthwash 2) showed the most cytotoxic effect.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Sodium Fluoride / Cetylpyridinium / Chlorhexidine / Ethanol / Mouthwashes Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Biomed Res Int Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Turquía Country of publication: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Sodium Fluoride / Cetylpyridinium / Chlorhexidine / Ethanol / Mouthwashes Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Biomed Res Int Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Turquía Country of publication: Estados Unidos