Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Computed Tomography Attenuation Values of the High-Attenuating Crescent Sign Can Discriminate Between Rupture, Impending Rupture, and Non-Rupture of Aortic Aneurysms.
Ueda, Tatsuo; Hayashi, Hiromitsu; Ando, Takahiro; Iwata, Kotomi; Saito, Hidemasa; Kumita, Shin-Ichiro.
Affiliation
  • Ueda T; Department of Radiology, Nippon Medical School Hospital.
  • Hayashi H; Department of Radiology, Nippon Medical School Hospital.
  • Ando T; Department of Radiology, Nippon Medical School Hospital.
  • Iwata K; Department of Radiology, Nippon Medical School Hospital.
  • Saito H; Department of Radiology, Nippon Medical School Hospital.
  • Kumita SI; Department of Radiology, Nippon Medical School Hospital.
Circ J ; 85(12): 2184-2190, 2021 11 25.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34707030
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Although the high-attenuating crescent (HAC) sign can indicate aortic aneurysm (AA) impending rupture, the relation of its computed tomography (CT) value to the aneurysmal status remains unclear. This study compared the HAC sign CT-attenuation values among rupture, impending rupture, and non-rupture AA cases.Methods and 

Results:

This included 76 patients (mean age 77.0 years) diagnosed with HAC sign-associated AA between January 2005 and July 2015. The CT-attenuation values of the HAC sign (H) and aortic lumen (A) using region-of-interest methodology were measured and the H/A ratio was calculated. The study classified patients into the rupture group (R-G, n=36), impending rupture group (IR-G, n=16), and non-rupture group (NR-G, n=24); the H and the H/A ratio were compared among them. Additionally, the H and the H/A ratio cut-offs between the IR-G and NR-G groups were evaluated. The H and the H/A ratio were significantly higher in the R-G and IR-G than in the NR-G (both P<0.001); the H/A ratio was significantly higher in the R-G than in the IR-G (P=0.038). The optimal cut-off for H between the IR-G and NR-G was 50.3 Hounsfield units (area under the curve [AUC]=0.875; sensitivity=87.5%; specificity=87.5%), and that for the H/A ratio was 1.3 (AUC=0.909; sensitivity=91.7%; specificity=87.5%).

CONCLUSIONS:

Among patients with AA, the H and the H/A ratio were significantly higher in cases of rupture and impending rupture than in those of non-rupture.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aortic Rupture / Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Aged / Humans Language: En Journal: Circ J Journal subject: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aortic Rupture / Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Aged / Humans Language: En Journal: Circ J Journal subject: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article