Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic accuracy of brain stem auditory evoked response in distinguishing drug-induced parkinsonism from Parkinson'sdisease.
Nikmanesh, Najmeh; Sarani, Ebrahim Moghimi; Khazraei, Samaneh; Petramfar, Peyman; Ostovan, Vahid Reza.
Affiliation
  • Nikmanesh N; Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  • Sarani EM; Research Center for Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  • Khazraei S; Department of Psychiatry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  • Petramfar P; Clinical Neurology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Department of Neurology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  • Ostovan VR; Clinical Neurology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Department of Neurology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. Electronic address: ostovanv@gmail.com.
Neurophysiol Clin ; 51(6): 524-532, 2021 Dec.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34764016
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Brainstem auditory evoked response (BAER) is a non-invasive modality that can be used to investigate brainstem neuronal function in movement disorders. The differentiation between drug-induced parkinsonism (DIP) and Parkinson's disease (PD) can be very challenging. Although PD and DIP to some extent display similar clinical symptoms, the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms are entirely different. Given these differences in pathogenesis, and the diagnostic utility of BAER for detecting brainstem function, BAER may help to distinguish between PD and DIP. This study aimed to assess the accuracy and predictive values of BAER parameters in differentiating DIP from PD.

METHODS:

We prospectively studied143 participants classified within three groups, including 50 controls, 57 PD, and 36 DIP. BAER was performed on all patients in the study. Patients in the DIP group were followed up for at least one year after discontinuation of the causative drug and examined for final diagnosis. We compared BAER latencies of the three groups and measured sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios, and accuracy of BAER in diagnosing DIP.

RESULT:

Waves V, I-V, and III-V latencies were significantly prolonged among the PD patients compared to the DIP and the control group; however, there were no significant differences in BAER latencies between the DIP and the control group. Waves V and I-V latencies revealed the highest accuracy (86% and 79%, respectively) in distinguishing DIP from PD with high negative predictive value(89% and 83%, respectively) as well as a high negative likelihood ratio (0.2and 0.3, respectively).

CONCLUSION:

This study showed that waves V and I-V latencies are significantly prolonged in PD patients compared to those with DIP, consistent with the proposed mechanisms of neurodegeneration in PD, particularly in the midbrain and pons. Consequently, BAER could be used as a useful diagnostic tool for differentiating DIP from PD.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Parkinson Disease / Pharmaceutical Preparations Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Neurophysiol Clin Journal subject: FISIOLOGIA / NEUROLOGIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Irán

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Parkinson Disease / Pharmaceutical Preparations Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Neurophysiol Clin Journal subject: FISIOLOGIA / NEUROLOGIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Irán