Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparing Masticatory Performance of Maxillary Mini Dental Implant Overdentures, Complete Removable Dentures and Dentate Subjects.
Van Doorne, Luc; De Backer, Ben; Matthys, Carine; De Bruyn, Hugo; Vandeweghe, Stefan.
Affiliation
  • Van Doorne L; Oral and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Bilkske 68 "Het Tandplein", 8000 Brugge, Belgium.
  • De Backer B; Oral and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
  • Matthys C; Oral and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, General Hospital AZZENO, Kalvekeetdijk 260, 8300 Knokke, Belgium.
  • De Bruyn H; Oral Health Sciences, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
  • Vandeweghe S; Oral Health Sciences, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
J Clin Med ; 10(21)2021 Oct 27.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34768527
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Mini dental implant (MDI) overdenture rehabilitation for the edentulous maxilla is a valuable, less invasive and affordable treatment alternative for complete removable dentures (CRD). However, comparative quantification of masticatory performance in different oral conditions are scarce.

PURPOSE:

This study compares objective masticatory performance of dentate groups, maxillary CRD and MDI overdentures and subjective masticatory performance in maxillary CRD and MDI overdentures. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Four groups were defined, age 20+ dentate dental students (DS), age 50+ complete dentate subjects (DP), age 50+ maxillary CRD or MDI overdentures/dentate mandible. Objective masticatory performance was evaluated by measuring circular Variance of Hue (VOH) or the mixture degree of two-color chewing gum (Hue-check View Gum® Test). Additionally, subjective masticatory comparison was investigated in the CRD and MDI groups, with a visual analogue scale (VAS) for different food consistencies and the Oral Health Related Quality of Life (OHRQL) OHIP-14 questionnaire.

RESULTS:

The mean VOH was 0.11 (SD 0.50, range 0.05-0.27) for the dentate dental 20+ students, 0.13 (SD 0.08, range 0.03-0.31) for the 50+ dentate group (p = 0.774), 0.41 (SD 0.41, range 0.14-0.76) for the CRD group and 0.39 (SD 0.18, range 0.07-0.76) for the MDI group (p = 0.725). Based on the VAS scores, no improvement was found between the CRD and the MDI overdenture group (p > 0.050). The mean OHIP-14 total score was 12.10 (SD 15.87, range 0-56) for CRD, while the MDI group (p = 0.039) saw a significant improvement to 2.85 (SD 2.85, range 0-15).

CONCLUSION:

Comparable results in objective masticatory performance were registered in dentate 20+ and 50+ subjects with a remarkable inferior outcome for the CRD and MDI group. Compared to CRD, MDI overdentures revealed no substantial improvement in subjective and objective masticatory performance. However, for MDI a significant increase in OHRQL was apparent.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Aspects: Patient_preference Language: En Journal: J Clin Med Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Bélgica

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Aspects: Patient_preference Language: En Journal: J Clin Med Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Bélgica