Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Treatment of cervical myelopathy by posterior approach: Laminoplasty vs. laminectomy with posterior fixation, are there differences from a clinical and radiological point of view?
Rodríguez Domínguez, Víctor; Gandía González, María Luisa; García Feijoo, Pablo; Sáez Alegre, Miguel; Vivancos Sánchez, Catalina; Pérez López, Carlos; Isla Guerrero, Alberto.
Affiliation
  • Rodríguez Domínguez V; Servicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: vitivalde_11@hotmail.com.
  • Gandía González ML; Servicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
  • García Feijoo P; Servicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
  • Sáez Alegre M; Servicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
  • Vivancos Sánchez C; Servicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
  • Pérez López C; Servicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
  • Isla Guerrero A; Servicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Neurocirugia (Astur : Engl Ed) ; 33(6): 284-292, 2022.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34799283
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Cervical degenerative myelopathy is a variable and progressive degenerative disease caused by chronic compression of the spinal cord. Surgical approaches for the cervical spine can be performed anteriorly and/or posteriorly. Regarding the posterior approach, there are 2 fundamental techniques laminoplasty and laminectomy with posterior fixation (LPF). There is still controversy concerning the technique in terms of outcome and complications. The aim of the present work is to analyze from the clinical and radiological point of view these 2 techniques laminoplasty and LPF. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A historical cohort of 39 patients was reviewed (12 LFP and 27 laminoplasty) including patients operated in a 10 years period at the Hospital Universitario La Paz with a follow-up of 12 months after surgery was carried out. The clinical results were analyzed and compared using the Nurick scale and the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scale (mJOA) and the radiological results using the Cobb angle, Sagittal Vertical Axis, T1 Slope and alignment (measured by Cobb-T1 Sloppe).

RESULTS:

Significant differences were observed in the postoperative improvement of the Nurick scale (p = 0.008) and mJOA (p = 0.018) in the laminoplasty group. In LFP there is a tendency to a greater improvement, but statistical significance is not reached due to the low sample size of this group. No statistically significant differences were observed in the radiological variables. Regarding the total number of complications, a higher number was observed in the laminoplasty group (7 cases) versus LFP (one case), but no statistically significant differences were observed.

CONCLUSIONS:

Laminoplasty and LFP are both safe and effective procedures in the treatment of cervical degenerative myelopathy. The findings of our study demonstrate statistically significant clinical improvement based on the Nurick and mJOA scales with laminoplasty. No significant differences in terms of complications or radiological variables were observed between the 2 techniques.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Spinal Cord Diseases / Laminoplasty Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Neurocirugia (Astur : Engl Ed) Year: 2022 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Spinal Cord Diseases / Laminoplasty Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Neurocirugia (Astur : Engl Ed) Year: 2022 Document type: Article