Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Preliminary application of the Asia-Pacific colorectal screening score combined with the quantitative fecal occult blood in colorectal neoplasia screening].
Kang, Q; Li, N; Wang, R F; Yang, L; Jin, P; Sheng, J Q.
Affiliation
  • Kang Q; Eastern Medical District of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100011, China.
  • Li N; Department of Gastroenterology, the Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100700, China.
  • Wang RF; Eastern Medical District of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100011, China.
  • Yang L; Department of Gastroenterology, the Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100700, China.
  • Jin P; Department of Gastroenterology, the Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100700, China.
  • Sheng JQ; Department of Gastroenterology, the Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100700, China.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 101(46): 3825-3828, 2021 Dec 14.
Article in Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34895425
ABSTRACT
To evaluate the efficacy of the Asia-Pacific colorectal screening (APCS) score combined with the quantitative fecal immunochemical test in colorectal neoplasia screening. Subjects who appointment to receive colonoscopy were recruited from August 2017 to May 2019 in the digestive endoscopy center. Before the colonoscopy, all subjects were scored by the Asia Pacific colorectal cancer screening scoring system and measured by quantitative fecal immunochemical test (QFIT). The detection rates of colorectal neoplasia were compared to evaluate the efficacy of the combined assay in colorectal neoplasia screening between APCS score and QFIT. A total of 1 420 subjects were enrolled in this study, APCS score medium-risk (MR) and high-risk (HR) groups were 847 (59.7%) and 573 (40.4%) and 26 cases (1.8%) of colorectal cancer, 196 cases (13.8%) of advanced adenoma, and 395 cases (27.8%) of non-advanced adenoma were detected. With the combination of APCS score and QFIT, participants were classified into 4 groups high-risk with positive QFIT result group G1, high-risk with negative QFIT result group G2, medium-risk with positive QFIT group G3, medium-risk negative QFIT group G4. The prevalence of colorectal neoplasia was 64.3%, 16.4%, 55.0%, and 9.8%, respectively. The prevalence of advanced neoplasia in high-risk with QFIT results was significantly higher than that in other 3 groups. HR and positive QFIT were the indicators for further colonoscopy, and MR with FIT negative group could postpone colonoscopy and conduct annual QFIT follow-up. The combination of APCS score and QFIT for colorectal neoplasia screening can reduce unnecessary colonoscopy, improve colonoscopy compliance and screening efficiency, and has important clinical significance and promotion value in colorectal tumor screening.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Colorectal Neoplasms / Occult Blood Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: Zh Journal: Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Colorectal Neoplasms / Occult Blood Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: Zh Journal: Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China