Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cytogenomic Profile of Uterine Leiomyoma: In Vivo vs. In Vitro Comparison.
Koltsova, Alla S; Efimova, Olga A; Malysheva, Olga V; Osinovskaya, Natalia S; Liehr, Thomas; Al-Rikabi, Ahmed; Shved, Natalia Yu; Sultanov, Iskender Yu; Chiryaeva, Olga G; Yarmolinskaya, Maria I; Polenov, Nikolai I; Kunitsa, Vladislava V; Kakhiani, Maka I; Tral, Tatyana G; Tolibova, Gulrukhsor Kh; Bespalova, Olesya N; Kogan, Igor Yu; Glotov, Andrey S; Baranov, Vladislav S; Pendina, Anna A.
Affiliation
  • Koltsova AS; D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia.
  • Efimova OA; D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia.
  • Malysheva OV; D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia.
  • Osinovskaya NS; D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia.
  • Liehr T; Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich Schiller University, 07747 Jena, Germany.
  • Al-Rikabi A; Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich Schiller University, 07747 Jena, Germany.
  • Shved NY; D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia.
  • Sultanov IY; D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia.
  • Chiryaeva OG; D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia.
  • Yarmolinskaya MI; D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia.
  • Polenov NI; D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia.
  • Kunitsa VV; D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia.
  • Kakhiani MI; D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia.
  • Tral TG; D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia.
  • Tolibova GK; D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia.
  • Bespalova ON; D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia.
  • Kogan IY; D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia.
  • Glotov AS; D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia.
  • Baranov VS; D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia.
  • Pendina AA; D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia.
Biomedicines ; 9(12)2021 Nov 26.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34944592
ABSTRACT
We performed a comparative cytogenomic analysis of cultured and uncultured uterine leiomyoma (UL) samples. The experimental approach included karyotyping, aCGH, verification of the detected chromosomal abnormalities by metaphase and interphase FISH, MED12 mutation analysis and telomere measurement by Q-FISH. An abnormal karyotype was detected in 12 out of 32 cultured UL samples. In five karyotypically abnormal ULs, MED12 mutations were found. The chromosomal abnormalities in ULs were present mostly by complex rearrangements, including chromothripsis. In both karyotypically normal and abnormal ULs, telomeres were ~40% shorter than in the corresponding myometrium, being possibly prerequisite to chromosomal rearrangements. The uncultured samples of six karyotypically abnormal ULs were checked for the detected chromosomal abnormalities through interphase FISH with individually designed DNA probe sets. All chromosomal abnormalities detected in cultured ULs were found in corresponding uncultured samples. In all tumors, clonal spectra were present by the karyotypically abnormal cell clone/clones which coexisted with karyotypically normal ones, suggesting that chromosomal abnormalities acted as drivers, rather than triggers, of the neoplastic process. In vitro propagation did not cause any changes in the spectrum of the cell clones, but altered their ratio compared to uncultured sample. The alterations were unique for every UL. Compared to its uncultured counterpart, the frequency of chromosomally abnormal cells in the cultured sample was higher in some ULs and lower in others. To summarize, ULs are characterized by both inter- and intratumor genetic heterogeneity. Regardless of its MED12 status, a tumor may be comprised of clones with and without chromosomal abnormalities. In contrast to the clonal spectrum, which is unique and constant for each UL, the clonal frequency demonstrates up or down shifts under in vitro conditions, most probably determined by the unequal ability of cells with different genetic aberrations to exist outside the body.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Biomedicines Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Rusia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Biomedicines Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Rusia
...