Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Quality Measures for Detection of Neoplasia at Screening Colonoscopy.
Wieszczy, Paulina; Bugajski, Marek; Januszewicz, Wladyslaw; Rupinska, Maria; Szlak, Jakub; Pisera, Malgorzata; Turkot, Maryla H; Rupinski, Maciej; Wojciechowska, Urszula; Didkowska, Joanna; Regula, Jaroslaw; Kaminski, Michal F.
Affiliation
  • Wieszczy P; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland; Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. Electronic address: pwieszczy@cmkp.edu.pl.
  • Bugajski M; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland; Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Oncological Gastroenterology and Department of Cancer Pr
  • Januszewicz W; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland; Department of Oncological Gastroenterology and Department of Cancer Prevention, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Rupinska M; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland; Department of Oncological Gastroenterology and Department of Cancer Prevention, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Szlak J; Department of Oncological Gastroenterology and Department of Cancer Prevention, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Pisera M; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Turkot MH; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Rupinski M; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland; Department of Oncological Gastroenterology and Department of Cancer Prevention, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Wojciechowska U; National Cancer Registry of Poland, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Didkowska J; National Cancer Registry of Poland, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Regula J; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland; Department of Oncological Gastroenterology and Department of Cancer Prevention, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Kaminski MF; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland; Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Oncological Gastroenterology and Department of Cancer Pr
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 21(1): 200-209.e6, 2023 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35341951
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND &

AIMS:

The proportion of colonoscopies with at least one adenoma (adenoma detection rate [ADR]) is inversely associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) risk and death. The aim of this study was to examine whether such associations exist for colonoscopy quality measures other than ADR.

METHODS:

We used data from the Polish Colorectal Cancer Screening Program collected in 2000-2011. For all endoscopists who performed ≥100 colonoscopies we calculated detection rates of adenomas (ADR), polyps (PDR), and advanced adenomas (≥10 mm/villous component/high-grade dysplasia [AADR]); and number of adenomas per colonoscopy (APC) and per colonoscopy with ≥1 adenoma (APPC). We followed patients until CRC diagnosed before recommended surveillance, death, or December 31, 2019. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using Cox proportional-hazard models. We used Harrell's C statistic to compare the predictive power of the quality measures.

RESULTS:

Data on 173,287 patients (median age, 56 years; 37.8% male) and 262 endoscopists were used. During a median follow-up of 10 years and 1,490,683 person-years, we identified 395 CRCs. All quality measures were significantly associated with CRC risk and death. The relative reductions in CRC risk were as follows for ADR ≥24.9% (reference <12.1%; HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.25-0.66), PDR ≥42.7% (reference <19.9%; HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.24-0.51), AADR ≥9.1% (reference <4.1%; HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.49-0.96), APC ≥0.37 (reference <0.15; HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.21-0.58), and APPC ≥1.54 (reference <1.19; HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.35-0.83). AADR was the only quality measure with significantly lower predictive power than ADR (Harrell's C, 59.7 vs 63.4; P = .001). Similar relative reductions were observed for CRC death.

CONCLUSIONS:

This large observational study confirmed the inverse association between ADR and CRC risk and death. The PDR and APC quality measures appear to be comparable with ADR.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Colorectal Neoplasms / Adenoma Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Colorectal Neoplasms / Adenoma Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article