Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impella 5.0 is associated with a reduction in vasoactive support and improves hemodynamics in cardiogenic shock: A single-center experience.
Bashline, Michael J; Rhinehart, Zachary; Kola, Olivia; Fowler, Jeffrey; Kaczorowski, David; Hickey, Gavin.
Affiliation
  • Bashline MJ; Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Rhinehart Z; Department of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Kola O; Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Fowler J; Department of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Kaczorowski D; Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Hickey G; Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Int J Artif Organs ; 45(5): 462-469, 2022 May.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35365048
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Treatment of cardiogenic shock (CS) often requires the use of vasopressors and inotropic agents, which are associated with an increase in mortality. Data on change in vasopressor and inotrope requirements post Impella 5.0 placement is scarce. Thus, we aimed to study the ability of Impella 5.0 to reduce these requirements.

METHODS:

Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with CS receiving Impella 5.0 was performed. Vasopressor-Inotrope Score (VIS) and a Modified Catecholamine Equivalent score (MCES) was calculated prior to and up to 72 h post-Impella implantation. Primary outcome was change in MCES from baseline to 48-h post implantation and secondary outcomes included change in VIS, changes in MCES according to SCAI Stage and to underlying etiology, and freedom from mortality at 30-days.

RESULTS:

Twenty-eight patients with median age of 61 (48, 67) years were included. Impella 5.0 was associated with significant reduction in MCES from baseline [9.7 (5.3, 17)] to 48 h [5.7 (3.8, 7.5), p = 0.001]. VIS was also significantly reduced from baseline [8.3 (3.8, 19.9)] to 48 h [5.0 (2.5, 8), p = 0.003]. MCES at 48 h was significantly reduced in patients with SCAI Stage E versus Stage C (p = 0.026) and with acute myocardial infarction versus acute decompensated heart (p = 0.003). Thirty-day survival was 0% in patients that had a baseline MCES ⩾ 10 without a reduction in MCES of at least 5 at 24 h.

CONCLUSION:

Impella 5.0 is associated with a significant reduction in MCES and VIS scores in patients presenting with CS with 30-day survival being dependent on MCES.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Shock, Cardiogenic / Heart-Assist Devices Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Int J Artif Organs Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Shock, Cardiogenic / Heart-Assist Devices Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Int J Artif Organs Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos