Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
DNA repair proteins as the targets for paroxetine to induce cytotoxicity in gastric cancer cell AGS.
Liu, Bang-Hung; Yuan, Tein-Ming; Huang, Chih-Jou; Hsu, Duan-Ting; Chen, Shi-Wen; Hsiao, Nai-Wan; Lin, Sheng-Chih; Wu, Shu-Wan; Lin, Yi-Mei J; Chuang, Show-Mei.
Affiliation
  • Liu BH; Institute of Biomedical Sciences, National Chung Hsing University Taichung 402, Taiwan.
  • Yuan TM; Department of Surgery, Feng Yuan Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare Taichung 420, Taiwan.
  • Huang CJ; Institute of Biomedical Sciences, National Chung Hsing University Taichung 402, Taiwan.
  • Hsu DT; Institute of Biomedical Sciences, National Chung Hsing University Taichung 402, Taiwan.
  • Chen SW; Department of Surgery, Feng Yuan Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare Taichung 420, Taiwan.
  • Hsiao NW; Department of Biology, National Changhua University of Education Changhua 500, Taiwan.
  • Lin SC; Institute of Biomedical Sciences, National Chung Hsing University Taichung 402, Taiwan.
  • Wu SW; Institute of Molecular Biology, Academia Sinica Taipei 115, Taiwan.
  • Lin YJ; College of Life Sciences, Inservice Master Program in Life Sciences, National Chung Hsing University Taichung 402, Taiwan.
  • Chuang SM; Institute of Biomedical Sciences, National Chung Hsing University Taichung 402, Taiwan.
Am J Cancer Res ; 12(4): 1465-1483, 2022.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35530295
ABSTRACT
To evaluate the potential anticancer effects of 1175 FDA-approved drugs, cell viability screening was performed using 25 human cancer cell lines covering 14 human cancer types. Here, we focus on the action of paroxetine, which demonstrated greater toxicity toward human gastric adenocarcinoma cell-line AGS cells compared with the other FDA-approved drugs, exhibiting an IC50 value lower than 10 µM. Evaluation of the underlying novel mechanisms revealed that paroxetine can enhance DNA damage in gastric cancer cells and involves downregulation of Rad51, HR23B and ERCC1 expression and function, as well as nucleotide shortage. Enhancement of autophagy counteracted paroxetine-induced apoptosis but did not affect paroxetine-induced DNA damage. Paroxetine also enhanced ROS generation in AGS cells, but a ROS scavenger did not improve paroxetine-mediated DNA damage, apoptosis, or autophagy, suggesting ROS might play a minor role in paroxetine-induced cell toxicity. In contrast, paroxetine did not enhance DNA damage, apoptosis, or autophagy in another insensitive gastric adenocarcinoma cell-line MKN-45 cells. Interestingly, co-administration of paroxetine with conventional anticancer agents sensitized MKN-45 cells to these agents co-treated cells showed increased apoptosis relative to MKN-45 cells treated with the anticancer agent alone. Unequivocally, these data suggest that for the first time that paroxetine triggers cytotoxicity and DNA damage in AGS cells at least partly by reducing the gene expression of Rad51, HR23B, and ERCC1. Our findings also suggest that paroxetine is a promising candidate anticancer agent and/or chemosensitizing agent for use in combination with other anticancer drugs in cancer therapy. The molecular mechanisms underlying the anticancer activity of co-treatment with paroxetine and chemotherapy appear to be complex and are worthy of further investigation.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Am J Cancer Res Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Taiwán

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Am J Cancer Res Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Taiwán
...