Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pharmacokinetic profile of children with haemophilia A receiving low-dose FVIII prophylaxis in Indonesia: A single centre experience.
Primacakti, Fitri; Sari, Teny T; Gatot, Djajadiman; Sjakti, Hikari A; Chozie, Novie A.
Affiliation
  • Primacakti F; Paediatric Haematology-Oncology Division, Department of Child Health, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  • Sari TT; Paediatric Haematology-Oncology Division, Department of Child Health, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  • Gatot D; Paediatric Haematology-Oncology Division, Department of Child Health, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  • Sjakti HA; Paediatric Haematology-Oncology Division, Department of Child Health, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  • Chozie NA; Paediatric Haematology-Oncology Division, Department of Child Health, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Haemophilia ; 28(5): 720-725, 2022 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35537097
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies of low-dose prophylaxis (LDP) of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) in children with severe haemophilia A (SHA) are scarce.

OBJECTIVE:

This study aims to investigate the PK profile of children with SHA receiving LDP of FVIII.

METHODS:

Paediatric patients receiving FVIII infusions (10 IU/kg twice weekly) were included. PK profiles were estimated using the Web Accessible Population Pharmacokinetic Service for Haemophilia (WAPPS-Haemo). The primary outcomes were the terminal half-life (t1/2 ), concentration-time profile, and time to reach an FVIII level of < 1%. The secondary outcome was the suggested dosing interval of FVIII prophylaxis based on the individual PK profile.

RESULTS:

Twenty-five patients were recruited; their mean age was 12.3 ± 3.0 years. The t1/2 differed among patients receiving LDP of FVIII twice weekly, with a median of t1/2 was 14.8 h (IQR 12.6-16). The median time to reach an FVIII level of < 1% was 73.8 h (IQR 58.8-80.3). Most patients could maintain a trough level of FVIII > 1% longer than 48 h. At 72-96 h, patients needed a second dose of FVIII infusion because the FVIII level was < 1%. The suggested dosing interval of FVIII prophylaxis ranged from daily to every 96 h, depending on the individual PK profile.

CONCLUSION:

Our study identified inter-individual differences in the PK parameters using LDP of FVIII twice weekly. The inter-individual results in different dosing intervals advise the timing of LDP. Estimating individual PK parameters enables the identification of the optimal prophylaxis frequency to prevent bleedings.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Hemostatics / Hemophilia A Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Adolescent / Child / Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: Haemophilia Journal subject: HEMATOLOGIA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Indonesia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Hemostatics / Hemophilia A Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Adolescent / Child / Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: Haemophilia Journal subject: HEMATOLOGIA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Indonesia