Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk Factor Profile in Youth, Genetic Risk, and Adulthood Cognitive Function: The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study.
Wu, Feitong; Ahola-Olli, Ari; Pahkala, Katja; Hakala, Juuso O; Juonala, Markus; Salo, Pia; Lehtimäki, Terho; Hutri-Kähönen, Nina; Kähönen, Mika; Laitinen, Tomi; Tossavainen, Päivi; Taittonen, Leena; Jokinen, Eero; Viikari, Jorma S A; Magnussen, Costan G; Raitakari, Olli T; Rovio, Suvi P.
Affiliation
  • Wu F; Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Ahola-Olli A; Institute for Molecular Medicine (FIMM), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Pahkala K; Research Centre of Applied and Preventive Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
  • Hakala JO; Centre for Population Health Research, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
  • Juonala M; Sports & Exercise Medicine Unit, Department of Physical Activity and Health, Paavo Nurmi Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
  • Salo P; Research Centre of Applied and Preventive Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
  • Lehtimäki T; Centre for Population Health Research, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
  • Hutri-Kähönen N; Sports & Exercise Medicine Unit, Department of Physical Activity and Health, Paavo Nurmi Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
  • Kähönen M; Department of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
  • Laitinen T; Division of Medicine, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
  • Tossavainen P; Research Centre of Applied and Preventive Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
  • Taittonen L; Centre for Population Health Research, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
  • Jokinen E; Department of Clinical Chemistry, Fimlab Laboratories and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Finnish Cardiovascular Research Center - Tampere, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
  • Viikari JSA; Department of Pediatrics, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
  • Magnussen CG; Department of Clinical Physiology, Tampere University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
  • Raitakari OT; Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital and University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
  • Rovio SP; Department of Pediatrics, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Neuroepidemiology ; 56(3): 201-211, 2022.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35552281
INTRODUCTION: The role of risk factor profile in childhood and adolescence on adulthood cognitive function and whether it differs by genetic risk is still obscure. To bring this evidence, we determined cognitive domain-specific youth risk factor profiles leveraging the childhood/adolescence data from the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study and examined whether genetic propensity for poor cognitive function modifies the association between the risk profiles and adulthood cognitive function. METHODS: From 1980, a population-based cohort of 3,596 children (age 3-18 years) has been repeatedly followed up for 31 years. Computerized cognitive test measuring (1) memory and learning, (2) short-term working memory, (3) reaction time, and (4) information processing was performed for 2,026 participants (age 34-49 years). Cognitive domain-specific youth risk profile scores, including physical and environmental factors, were assessed from the data collected at baseline and categorized into favourable, intermediate, and unfavourable. A polygenic risk score for a poor cognitive function was categorized into low, intermediate, and high risk. RESULTS: At all genetic risk levels, a favourable youth risk factor profile is associated with better learning and memory, short-term working memory, and information processing compared to unfavourable risk profile (e.g., ß = 0.501 SD, 95% CI: 0.043-0.959 for memory and learning among participants with high genetic risk). However, no significant interactions were observed between the youth risk factor profile score and genetic propensity for any cognitive domain (p > 0.299 for all). CONCLUSION: A favourable youth risk factor profile may be beneficial for cognitive function in adulthood, irrespective of genetic propensity for poor cognitive function.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cardiovascular Diseases Type of study: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Humans / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Neuroepidemiology Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia Country of publication: Suiza

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cardiovascular Diseases Type of study: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Humans / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Neuroepidemiology Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia Country of publication: Suiza