Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient, provider, and nurse preferences of patient reported outcomes (PRO) and side effect management during cancer treatment of underrepresented racial and ethnic minority groups, rural and economically disadvantaged patients: a mixed methods study.
Tawfik, Bernard; Burgess, Ellen; Kosich, Mikaela; Jaffe, Shoshana Adler; Guest, Dolores D; Brown-Glaberman, Ursa; Pankratz, V Shane; Sussman, Andrew.
Affiliation
  • Tawfik B; University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA. btawfik@salud.unm.edu.
  • Burgess E; Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of New Mexico Department of Internal Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA. btawfik@salud.unm.edu.
  • Kosich M; Division of Hematology/Oncology, UNM Comprehensive Cancer Center, MSC 07-4025, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131-0001, USA. btawfik@salud.unm.edu.
  • Jaffe SA; University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
  • Guest DD; University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
  • Brown-Glaberman U; University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
  • Pankratz VS; University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
  • Sussman A; Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Preventive Medicine, University of New Mexico Department of Internal Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Cancer Causes Control ; 33(9): 1193-1205, 2022 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35829828
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient, oncologist and nurse perspectives on side effects and patient reported outcomes (PROs) with the question of how to optimize side effect management and PRO tools in this unique population.

METHODS:

This pilot study utilized a mixed method explanatory design. Patients receiving intravenous (IV) chemotherapy from June to August 2020 were surveyed about side effect burden and PRO system preferences. Providers and nurses (PN) completed complementary surveys. Semi-structured phone interviews were conducted among a subset of each group.

RESULTS:

Of 90 patient surveys collected; 51.1% minority, 35.6% rural, and 40.0% income < $30,000, 48% felt side effect management was a significant issue. All patients reported access to a communication device but 12.2% did not own a cell phone; 68% smart phone, 20% cell phone, 22% landline, 53% computer, and 39% tablet. Patients preferred a response to reported side effects within 0-3 h (73%) while only 29% of the 55 PN surveyed did (p < 0.0001). Interviews reinforced that side effect burden was a significant issue, the varied communication devices, and a PRO system could improve side effect management.

CONCLUSION:

In a non-White, rural and low-income patient population, 87.8% of patients reported owning a cell phone. Although all agreed side effect management was a prominent issue, expectations between patients and PN differed substantially. Qualitative data echoed the above and providing concrete suggestions to inform development of a PRO program and side effect mitigation strategies among a diverse patient population.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ethnicity / Neoplasms Type of study: Health_economic_evaluation / Qualitative_research Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Cancer Causes Control Journal subject: EPIDEMIOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ethnicity / Neoplasms Type of study: Health_economic_evaluation / Qualitative_research Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Cancer Causes Control Journal subject: EPIDEMIOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos