[Analysis of the impact of increasing feminization in the healthcare system on urology]. / Analyse des Einflusses der zunehmenden Feminisierung im Gesundheitswesen auf die Urologie.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate gender aspects and trends in urological clinics, research and private practice. The focus was on the objectification of gender-specific changes in the field of urology at the current time and in the future. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A digital survey among urological physicians in Germany was conducted with the SurveyMonkey© portal, which was sent to all registered members via the email distribution lists of the German Society of Urology (DGU) and the Professional Association of German Urologists (BvDU). Baseline data were collected in the outpatient and inpatient sectors, as were gender-specific data related to job distribution, goals, satisfaction, and reasons for career decisions. RESULTS: The analysis of 398 responses revealed that urological colleagues in private practice were less likely to be female (23.6%) and significantly older (mean age 53 years) than in the inpatient sector (female proportion 47.2%, mean age 43 years). More men (49.4%) than women (29.9%) were in private practice and this was indicated as a career aspiration by more men than women (28.1% vs. 22.8%). The reasons for setting up a practice were more often family-related for women than for men (main reasons good opportunity or career aspiration). Women were more likely to work part-time (27.0% vs. 11.5%) and more likely to aspire to a career as a senior physician (29.1% of women, 9.4% of men). Correspondingly, the desire for a postdoctoral position or professorship was more common among women than among men (20.5% vs. 15%). Significantly more female urologists perceived inequality in career advancement opportunities (59.7% vs. 17.5%, p < 0.001) and 73.3% (vs. 18.5% of men, p < 0.001) perceived their gender as a cause of disadvantage. This resulted in significantly lower satisfaction of women with their professional status (p = 0.008) as well as a lower feeling of being valued (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In order to prepare our specialty field for the future, it is essential to give even greater consideration to gender aspects. The path taken to offer the next generation of urologists a modern specialty in which all physicians, regardless of their gender, enjoy working, are valued and where equal opportunities prevail, should definitely be pursued and intensified in order to position urology well for the future.