Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
♣Evaluation of clinicopathological profiles and development of a risk model in renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma patients: a large-scale retrospective cohort study.
Anwaier, Aihetaimujiang; Xu, Wen-Hao; Tian, Xi; Ding, Tao; Su, Jia-Qi; Wang, Yue; Qu, Yuan-Yuan; Zhang, Hai-Liang; Ye, Ding-Wei.
Affiliation
  • Anwaier A; Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
  • Xu WH; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 20032, People's Republic of China.
  • Tian X; Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
  • Ding T; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 20032, People's Republic of China.
  • Su JQ; Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
  • Wang Y; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 20032, People's Republic of China.
  • Qu YY; Department of Urology, Southern Medical University Affiliated Fengxian Hospital, Shanghai, 201499, People's Republic of China.
  • Zhang HL; Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
  • Ye DW; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 20032, People's Republic of China.
BMC Urol ; 22(1): 148, 2022 Sep 12.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36096809
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

To identify the malignant potential and prognostic indicators of renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma (eAML), clinicopathological and molecular features as well as the drug efficacy of 67 eAML cases were analyzed. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Sixty-seven renal eAML patients were enrolled and the immunohistochemical features of these patients were examined. FFPE slides of all patients were re-examined. 21 patients with metastasis received Everolimus 10 mg orally once daily. Responses were evaluated with RECIST criteria by three authors. A risk stratification model was constructed using the following factors pT3 and pT4, presence of necrosis, mitotic count ≥ 2; the presence of atypical mitoses; severe nuclear atypia, SMA negative, Ki-67 ≥ 10%.

RESULTS:

The average percentage of the epithelioid component was 85.6% (range 80-95%). Immunohistochemically, Ki-67 ≥ 10% and negative SMA staining were significantly correlated with malignant characteristics (Ki-67 p < 0.001; SMA p = 0.001). Survival analysis suggested that pT3-pT4 stage, presence of necrosis, severe nuclear atypia, presence of atypical mitoses, mitotic count ≥ 2, Ki-67 ≥ 10% and negative SMA expression were significantly associated with poorer PFS and OS (p < 0.05). The risk model sufficiently discriminated recurrence/metastasis (AUC = 0.897) and cancer-specific mortality (AUC = 0.932) of renal eAML patients in different risk groups. 21 patients had received Everolimus targeted therapy after recurrence/metastasis. The best response for Everolimus treatment was 8/21 (38.1%) partial responses (PR), 9/21 (42.9%) stable disease (SD) and 4/21 (19.0%) progressive disease (PD).

CONCLUSION:

The risk stratification model could well distinguish eAML patients at high risk of recurrence/metastasis. Everolimus targeted treatment showed good efficacy in patients with recurrence/metastasis.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Angiomyolipoma / Kidney Neoplasms Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: BMC Urol Journal subject: UROLOGIA Year: 2022 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Angiomyolipoma / Kidney Neoplasms Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: BMC Urol Journal subject: UROLOGIA Year: 2022 Document type: Article