[Interpretation of systematic review articles and meta-analyses : Clinical trials in trauma surgery and orthopedics]. / Interpretation von systematischen Übersichtsarbeiten und Metaanalysen : Klinische Studien in Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie.

ABSTRACT

Clinical trials must be planned and interpreted in the context of current best clinical and scientific evidence, undoubtedly provided by systematic reviews and meta-analyses, especially Cochrane Reviews. While many clinicians feel overwhelmed by this complex data source, few visualElements (e.g., the traffic light system of the Cochrane risk of bias [RoB­2] tool, forest plots, etc.), together with indices such as the I2 heterogeneity statistic, allow for a quick appraisal of all critical and necessary qualitative and quantitative information. The effectiveness of different treatment options can indirectly be assessed by methodological advancements like network meta-analyses.Point estimates of percentages are insufficient to describe the utility and value of a proposed novel intervention, which, in orthopedic and trauma surgery, often represents a step innovation. 95% confidence intervals and the so-called fragility index are helpful in determining the ultimate patient benefit.