Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety and efficacy of roux-en-y gastric bypass in older aged patients.
Quintero, Jorge Humberto Rodriguez; Grosser, Rachel; Velez, Gustavo Romero; Ramos-Santillan, Vicente Omar; Pereira, Xavier; Flores, Fernando Muñoz; Choi, Jenny; Moran-Atkin, Erin; Camacho, Diego; Lima, Diego Laurentino.
Affiliation
  • Quintero JHR; - Montefiore Medical Center, Surgery - The Bronx - New York - Estados Unidos.
  • Grosser R; - Montefiore Medical Center, Surgery - The Bronx - New York - Estados Unidos.
  • Velez GR; - Montefiore Medical Center, Surgery - The Bronx - New York - Estados Unidos.
  • Ramos-Santillan VO; - Montefiore Medical Center, Surgery - The Bronx - New York - Estados Unidos.
  • Pereira X; - Montefiore Medical Center, Surgery - The Bronx - New York - Estados Unidos.
  • Flores FM; - Montefiore Medical Center, Surgery - The Bronx - New York - Estados Unidos.
  • Choi J; - Montefiore Medical Center, Surgery - The Bronx - New York - Estados Unidos.
  • Moran-Atkin E; - Montefiore Medical Center, Surgery - The Bronx - New York - Estados Unidos.
  • Camacho D; - Montefiore Medical Center, Surgery - The Bronx - New York - Estados Unidos.
  • Lima DL; - Montefiore Medical Center, Surgery - The Bronx - New York - Estados Unidos.
Rev Col Bras Cir ; 49: e20223332, 2022.
Article in En, Pt | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36197347
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) has been a revolutionary intervention for weight loss with reduction of up to 60-70% of excess body weight. However, these outcomes are not as well validated at the extremes of age, where the safety of the intervention still has some caveats. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of primary LRYGB among different age groups.

METHODS:

the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database was queried for patients who underwent primary LRYGB from January 2014 to December 2017 at a single institution. Four groups were created and compared by dividing our sample by age quartiles. The primary outcome was percent excess weight loss (%EWL) at 1 year. Additional operative outcomes and complications were also compared across groups.

RESULTS:

a total of 1013 patients underwent non-revisional LRYGB during the study period. Mean %EWL at one year was 55%. When compared between quartiles, there was a statistically significant difference in %EWL 1st 62%, 2nd 57%, 3rd 54% and 4th 47% (p=0.010). The differences in the secondary outcomes between age groups did not demonstrate statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS:

though patients in the fourth age quartile (range) did not demonstrate a statistically significant increase in adverse outcomes, they did lose less weight compared to other cohorts. The %EWL at one year after RYGB varied by age in our cohort. Goals after bariatric surgery should be individualized as weight loss is less robust with aging.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Obesity, Morbid / Gastric Bypass / Laparoscopy / Bariatric Surgery Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Aged / Humans / Middle aged Language: En / Pt Journal: Rev Col Bras Cir Year: 2022 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Obesity, Morbid / Gastric Bypass / Laparoscopy / Bariatric Surgery Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Aged / Humans / Middle aged Language: En / Pt Journal: Rev Col Bras Cir Year: 2022 Document type: Article