Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Understanding the use of evidence in the WHO Classification of Tumours: a protocol for an evidence gap map of the classification of tumours of the lung.
Del Aguila Mejía, Javier; Armon, Subasri; Campbell, Fiona; Colling, Richard; Chechlinska, Magdalena; Kowalewska, Magdalena; Pollán, Marina; Holdenrieder, Stefan; Tan, Puay Hoon; Cree, Ian; Indave Ruiz, Blanca Iciar.
Affiliation
  • Del Aguila Mejía J; WHO/IARC Classification of Tumours Programme, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
  • Armon S; WHO/IARC Classification of Tumours Programme, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
  • Campbell F; Evidence Synthesis Group, Population Health Sciences Institute Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Colling R; Department of Cellular Pathology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
  • Chechlinska M; Department of Cancer Biology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warszawa, Poland.
  • Kowalewska M; Department of Cancer Biology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warszawa, Poland.
  • Pollán M; Centro Nacional de Epidemiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
  • Holdenrieder S; CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain.
  • Tan PH; Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Munich Biomarker Research Center, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Munchen, Germany.
  • Cree I; Division of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
  • Indave Ruiz BI; WHO/IARC Classification of Tumours Programme, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
BMJ Open ; 12(10): e061240, 2022 10 11.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36220326
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

There are gaps in the evidence base of tumour classification despite being essential for cancer diagnosis, treatment and patient care. The WHO in charge of the production of an updated international classification, the WHO Classification of Tumours (WCT), aims to adapt evidence gap map (EGM) methodology to inform future editions of the WCT, by providing a visual summary of the existing evidence. METHODS AND

ANALYSIS:

Bibliographical references used in the WCT fifth edition of Tumours of the Lung (Thoracic Tumours volume) will be used as search results of a literature search. A descriptive analysis of the cited evidence for tumour types and descriptors will be drafted and plotted in EPPI-Reviewer to develop a visual evidence map. The resulting EGM will reflect the number of cited studies in the size of the spheres, and the level of evidence by applying a four-colour code (red=low level evidence, orange=moderate level, green=high level and blue=unclassifiable). Overview of the findings will be provided in narrative form and a report will discuss the overall stage of cited research in the WCT and will include analysis of gaps, under-researched categories of tumour descriptors and pockets of low-level evidence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION No ethics approval will be required as this is a study of previously published material. Findings of the EGM will be published and used to guide editors, stakeholders and researchers for future research planning and related decision-making, especially for the development of future editions of the WCT. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022302327.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Thoracic Neoplasms / Lung Neoplasms Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Aspects: Ethics Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Francia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Thoracic Neoplasms / Lung Neoplasms Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Aspects: Ethics Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Francia