Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intelligent multi-modal shear wave elastography to reduce unnecessary biopsies in breast cancer diagnosis (INSPiRED 002): a retrospective, international, multicentre analysis.
Pfob, André; Sidey-Gibbons, Chris; Barr, Richard G; Duda, Volker; Alwafai, Zaher; Balleyguier, Corinne; Clevert, Dirk-André; Fastner, Sarah; Gomez, Christina; Goncalo, Manuela; Gruber, Ines; Hahn, Markus; Hennigs, André; Kapetas, Panagiotis; Lu, Sheng-Chieh; Nees, Juliane; Ohlinger, Ralf; Riedel, Fabian; Rutten, Matthieu; Schaefgen, Benedikt; Stieber, Anne; Togawa, Riku; Tozaki, Mitsuhiro; Wojcinski, Sebastian; Xu, Cai; Rauch, Geraldine; Heil, Joerg; Golatta, Michael.
Affiliation
  • Pfob A; University Breast Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; MD Anderson Center for INSPiRED Cancer Care (Integrated Systems for Patient-Reported Data), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA. Electronic address: https
  • Sidey-Gibbons C; MD Anderson Center for INSPiRED Cancer Care (Integrated Systems for Patient-Reported Data), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA; Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/@DrCGi
  • Barr RG; Department of Radiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Ravenna, USA.
  • Duda V; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
  • Alwafai Z; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
  • Balleyguier C; Department of Radiology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif Cedex, France.
  • Clevert DA; Department of Radiology, University Hospital Munich-Grosshadern, Munich, Germany.
  • Fastner S; University Breast Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Gomez C; University Breast Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Goncalo M; Department of Radiology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
  • Gruber I; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
  • Hahn M; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
  • Hennigs A; University Breast Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Kapetas P; Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy Medical University of Vienna.
  • Lu SC; MD Anderson Center for INSPiRED Cancer Care (Integrated Systems for Patient-Reported Data), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA; Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
  • Nees J; University Breast Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Ohlinger R; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
  • Riedel F; University Breast Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Rutten M; Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 'S-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands. Diagnostic Image Analysis Group, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Schaefgen B; University Breast Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Stieber A; University Breast Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Togawa R; University Breast Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Tozaki M; Department of Radiology, Sagara Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan.
  • Wojcinski S; Breast Cancer Center/Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Bielefeld, Germany.
  • Xu C; MD Anderson Center for INSPiRED Cancer Care (Integrated Systems for Patient-Reported Data), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA; Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
  • Rauch G; Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany.
  • Heil J; University Breast Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Golatta M; University Breast Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: michael.golatta@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Eur J Cancer ; 177: 1-14, 2022 12.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36283244
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Breast ultrasound identifies additional carcinomas not detected in mammography but has a higher rate of false-positive findings. We evaluated whether use of intelligent multi-modal shear wave elastography (SWE) can reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies without impairing the breast cancer detection rate.

METHODS:

We trained, tested, and validated machine learning algorithms using SWE, clinical, and patient information to classify breast masses. We used data from 857 women who underwent B-mode breast ultrasound, SWE, and subsequent histopathologic evaluation at 12 study sites in seven countries from 2016 to 2019. Algorithms were trained and tested on data from 11 of the 12 sites and externally validated using the additional site's data. We compared findings to the histopathologic evaluation and compared the diagnostic performance between B-mode breast ultrasound, traditional SWE, and intelligent multi-modal SWE.

RESULTS:

In the external validation set (n = 285), intelligent multi-modal SWE showed a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI, 97.1-100%, 126 of 126), a specificity of 50.3% (95% CI, 42.3-58.3%, 80 of 159), and an area under the curve of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90-0.96). Diagnostic performance was significantly higher compared to traditional SWE and B-mode breast ultrasound (P < 0.001). Unlike traditional SWE, positive-predictive values of intelligent multi-modal SWE were significantly higher compared to B-mode breast ultrasound. Unnecessary biopsies were reduced by 50.3% (79 versus 159, P < 0.001) without missing cancer compared to B-mode ultrasound.

CONCLUSION:

The majority of unnecessary breast biopsies might be safely avoided by using intelligent multi-modal SWE. These results may be helpful to reduce diagnostic burden for patients, providers, and healthcare systems.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breast Neoplasms / Elasticity Imaging Techniques Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Eur J Cancer Year: 2022 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breast Neoplasms / Elasticity Imaging Techniques Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Eur J Cancer Year: 2022 Document type: Article
...