Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Weight-bearing cone-beam CT: the need for standardised acquisition protocols and measurements to fulfill high expectations-a review of the literature.
Brinch, Signe; Wellenberg, Ruud H H; Boesen, Mikael Ploug; Maas, Mario; Johannsen, Finn Elkjær; Nybing, Janus Uhd; Turmezei, Tom; Streekstra, Geert J; Hansen, Philip.
Affiliation
  • Brinch S; Department of Radiology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. Signe.brinch@regionh.dk.
  • Wellenberg RHH; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Boesen MP; Department of Radiology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Maas M; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Johannsen FE; Department of Sports Medicine, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Nybing JU; Department of Radiology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Turmezei T; Department of Radiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.
  • Streekstra GJ; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Hansen P; Department of Radiology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Skeletal Radiol ; 52(6): 1073-1088, 2023 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36350387
Weight bearing CT (WBCT) of the lower extremity is gaining momentum in evaluation of the foot/ankle and knee. A growing number of international studies use WBCT, which is promising for improving our understanding of anatomy and biomechanics during natural loading of the lower extremity. However, we believe there is risk of excessive enthusiasm for WBCT leading to premature application of the technique, before sufficiently robust protocols are in place e.g. standardised limb positioning and imaging planes, choice of anatomical landmarks and image slices used for individual measurements. Lack of standardisation could limit benefits from introducing WBCT in research and clinical practice because useful imaging information could become obscured. Measurements of bones and joints on WBCT are influenced by joint positioning and magnitude of loading, factors that need to be considered within a 3-D coordinate system. A proportion of WBCT studies examine inter- and intraobserver reproducibility for different radiological measurements in the knee or foot with reproducibility generally reported to be high. However, investigations of test-retest reproducibility are still lacking. Thus, the current ability to evaluate, e.g. the effects of surgery or structural disease progression, is questionable. This paper presents an overview of the relevant literature on WBCT in the lower extremity with an emphasis on factors that may affect measurement reproducibility in the foot/ankle and knee. We discuss the caveats of performing WBCT without consensus on imaging procedures and measurements.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cone-Beam Computed Tomography / Motivation Type of study: Guideline Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Skeletal Radiol Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Dinamarca Country of publication: Alemania

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cone-Beam Computed Tomography / Motivation Type of study: Guideline Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Skeletal Radiol Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Dinamarca Country of publication: Alemania