Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Osseointegration of Dental Implants Placed in Rabbit Tibia Using Two Dental Laser and Implant Handpiece Systems.
Park, Jin-Han; Son, Keunbada; Son, Young-Tak; Kim, Yong-Gun; Suh, Jo-Young; Lee, Kyu-Bok; Lee, Jae-Mok.
Affiliation
  • Park JH; Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea.
  • Son K; Advanced Dental Device Development Institute (A3DI), Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea.
  • Son YT; Advanced Dental Device Development Institute (A3DI), Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea.
  • Kim YG; Department of Dental Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea.
  • Suh JY; Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea.
  • Lee KB; Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea.
  • Lee JM; Advanced Dental Device Development Institute (A3DI), Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea.
Bioengineering (Basel) ; 9(11)2022 Nov 11.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36421082
The present study aimed to confirm the usefulness of a multi-laser handpiece system currently under development. Implants were placed in the tibia of rabbits using a conventional separate laser-implant handpiece system (control group; SurgicPro+; NSK, Kanuma, Japan and Epic 10; Biolase, Irvine, CA, USA) and a multi-laser handpiece system (experimental group; BLP 10; Saeshin, Daegu, Korea). Implants were placed in left and right tibias of five rabbits using a conventional laser-implant handpiece system and a multi-laser handpiece system (N = 5 per group). Subsequently, micro-computed tomography (micro-CT; bone-to-implant contact evaluation), implant stability quotient (ISQ) measurement, and histological evaluations were performed to confirm the implant placement results. The independent t-test and the paired t-test were used to compare the ISQ values and the results of the two implant-laser handpiece groups (α = 0.05), respectively. No statistically significant difference in micro-CT, ISQ, and histological evaluations was observed between implant placement by the two systems (p > 0.05) except implant initial stability. The use of the multi-laser handpiece system is expected to produce the same results as a conventional separate laser-implant handpiece system with the higher implant initial stability. Additionally, it will potentially make the clinical environment more pleasant and will provide convenience for the clinicians.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Bioengineering (Basel) Year: 2022 Document type: Article Country of publication: Suiza

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Bioengineering (Basel) Year: 2022 Document type: Article Country of publication: Suiza