Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Association of Pain Phenotypes with Risk of Falls and Incident Fractures.
Devine, Maxim; Ma, Canchen; Tian, Jing; Antony, Benny; Cicuttini, Flavia; Jones, Graeme; Pan, Feng.
Affiliation
  • Devine M; Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia.
  • Ma C; Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia.
  • Tian J; Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia.
  • Antony B; Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia.
  • Cicuttini F; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University Medical School, Commercial Road, Melbourne 3181, Australia.
  • Jones G; Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia.
  • Pan F; Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia.
Biomedicines ; 10(11)2022 Nov 14.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36428490
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To compare whether falls risk score and incident fracture over 10.7 years were different among three previously identified pain phenotypes.

Methods:

Data on 915 participants (mean age 63 years) from a population-based cohort study were studied at baseline and follow-ups at 2.6, 5.1 and 10.7 years. Three pain phenotypes were previously identified using the latent class

analysis:

Class 1 high prevalence of emotional problems and low prevalence of structural damage; Class 2 high prevalence of structural damage and low prevalence of emotional problems; Class 3 low prevalence of emotional problems and low prevalence of structural damage. Fractures were self-reported and falls risk score was measured using the Physiological Profile Assessment. Generalized estimating equations model and linear mixed-effects model were used to compare differences in incident fractures and falls risk score over 10.7 years between pain phenotypes, respectively.

Results:

There were 3 new hip, 19 vertebral, and 121 non-vertebral fractures, and 138 any site fractures during 10.7-year follow-up. Compared with Class 3, Class 1 had a higher risk of vertebral (relative risk (RR) = 2.44, 95% CI 1.22-4.91), non-vertebral fractures (RR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.01-1.42), and any site fractures (RR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.04-1.46) after controlling for covariates, bone mineral density and falls risk score. Class 2 had a higher risk of non-vertebral and any site fracture relative to those in Class 3 (non-vertebral RR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.17-1.71; any site RR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.20-1.73), but not vertebral fracture. Compared with Class 3, Class 1 had a higher falls risk score at baseline (ß = 0.16, 95% CI 0.09-0.23) and over 10.7-year (ß = 0.03, 95% CI 0.01-0.04).

Conclusions:

Class 1 and/or Class 2 had a higher risk of incident fractures and falls risk score than Class 3, highlighting that targeted preventive strategies for fractures and falls are needed in pain population.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: Biomedicines Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: Biomedicines Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia