Synthetic tissues lack the fidelity for the use in burn care simulators.

ABSTRACT

This work compares the mechanical response of synthetic tissues used in burn care simulators from ten different manufacturers with that of ex vivo full thickness burned porcine skin as a surrogate for human skin tissues. This is of high practical importance since incorrect mechanical properties of synthetic tissues may introduce a negative bias during training due to the inaccurate haptic feedback from burn care simulator. A negative training may result in inadequately performed procedures, such as in escharotomy, which may lead to muscle necrosis endangering life and limb. Accurate haptic feedback in physical simulators is necessary to improve the practical training of non-expert providers for pre-deployment/pre-hospital burn care. With the U.S. Army's emerging doctrine of prolonged field care, non-expert providers must be trained to perform even invasive burn care surgical procedures when indicated. The comparison reported in this article is based on the ultimate tensile stress, ultimate tensile strain, and toughness that are measured at strain rates relevant to skin surgery. A multivariate analysis using logistic regression reveals significant differences in the mechanical properties of the synthetic and the porcine skin tissues. The synthetic and porcine skin tissues show a similar rate dependent behavior. The findings of this study are expected to guide the development of high-fidelity burn care simulators for the pre-deployment/pre-hospital burn care provider education.