Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Utility of adding Radiomics to clinical features in predicting the outcomes of radiotherapy for head and neck cancer using machine learning.
Gangil, Tarun; Sharan, Krishna; Rao, B Dinesh; Palanisamy, Krishnamoorthy; Chakrabarti, Biswaroop; Kadavigere, Rajagopal.
Affiliation
  • Gangil T; Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Kasturba Medical College-Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
  • Sharan K; Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Kasturba Medical College-Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
  • Rao BD; Manipal School of Information Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
  • Palanisamy K; Philips Research India, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
  • Chakrabarti B; Philips Research India, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
  • Kadavigere R; Department of Radiology, Kasturba Medical College-Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
PLoS One ; 17(12): e0277168, 2022.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36520945
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Radiomics involves the extraction of quantitative information from annotated Computed-Tomography (CT) images, and has been used to predict outcomes in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC). Subjecting combined Radiomics and Clinical features to Machine Learning (ML) could offer better predictions of clinical outcomes. This study is a comparative performance analysis of ML models with Clinical, Radiomics, and Clinico-Radiomic datasets for predicting four outcomes of HNSCC treated with Curative Radiation Therapy (RT) Distant Metastases, Locoregional Recurrence, New Primary, and Residual Disease.

METHODOLOGY:

The study used retrospective data of 311 HNSCC patients treated with radiotherapy between 2013-2018 at our centre. Binary prediction models were developed for the four outcomes with Clinical-only, Clinico-Radiomic, and Radiomics-only datasets, using three different ML classification algorithms namely, Random Forest (RF), Kernel Support Vector Machine (KSVM), and XGBoost. The best-performing ML algorithms of the three dataset groups was then compared.

RESULTS:

The Clinico-Radiomic dataset using KSVM classifier provided the best prediction. Predicted mean testing accuracy for Distant Metastases, Locoregional Recurrence, New Primary, and Residual Disease was 97%, 72%, 99%, and 96%, respectively. The mean area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was calculated and displayed for all the models using three dataset groups.

CONCLUSION:

Clinico-Radiomic dataset improved the predictive ability of ML models over clinical features alone, while models built using Radiomics performed poorly. Radiomics data could therefore effectively supplement clinical data in predicting outcomes.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Head and Neck Neoplasms / Neoplasm Recurrence, Local Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: India

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Head and Neck Neoplasms / Neoplasm Recurrence, Local Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: India