Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of anesthetic induction with propofol, alfaxalone or ketamine on intraocular pressure in cats: a randomized masked clinical investigation.
Shilo-Benjamini, Yael; Pe'er, Oren; Abu Ahmad, Wiessam; Ofri, Ron.
Affiliation
  • Shilo-Benjamini Y; Koret School of Veterinary Medicine, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel. Electronic address: shilo.yael@gmail.com.
  • Pe'er O; Koret School of Veterinary Medicine, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel.
  • Abu Ahmad W; Koret School of Veterinary Medicine, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel.
  • Ofri R; Koret School of Veterinary Medicine, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel.
Vet Anaesth Analg ; 50(1): 63-71, 2023 Jan.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36528512
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the effect of propofol, alfaxalone and ketamine on intraocular pressure (IOP) in cats. STUDY

DESIGN:

Prospective, masked, randomized clinical trial. ANIMALS A total of 43 ophthalmologically normal cats scheduled to undergo general anesthesia for various procedures.

METHODS:

Following baseline IOP measurements using applanation tonometry, anesthesia was induced with propofol (n = 15), alfaxalone (n = 14) or ketamine (n = 14) administered intravenously to effect. Then, midazolam (0.3 mg kg-1) was administered intravenously and endotracheal intubation was performed without application of topical anesthesia. The IOP was measured following each intervention. Data was analyzed using one-way anova and repeated-measures mixed design with post hoc analysis. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS:

Mean ± standard error IOP at baseline was not different among groups (propofol, 18 ± 0.6; alfaxalone, 18 ± 0.7; ketamine, 17 ± 0.5 mmHg). Following induction of anesthesia, IOP increased significantly compared with baseline in the propofol (20 ± 0.7 mmHg), but not in the alfaxalone (19 ± 0.8 mmHg) or ketamine (16 ± 0.7 mmHg) groups. Midazolam administration resulted in significant decrease from the previous measurement in the alfaxalone group (16 ± 0.7 mmHg), but not in the propofol group (19 ± 0.7 mmHg) or the ketamine (16 ± 0.8 mmHg) group. A further decrease was measured after intubation in the alfaxalone group (15 ± 0.9 mmHg). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Propofol should be used with caution in cats predisposed to perforation or glaucoma, as any increase in IOP should be avoided.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pregnanediones / Propofol / Ketamine / Anesthetics Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Vet Anaesth Analg Journal subject: ANESTESIOLOGIA / MEDICINA VETERINARIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pregnanediones / Propofol / Ketamine / Anesthetics Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Vet Anaesth Analg Journal subject: ANESTESIOLOGIA / MEDICINA VETERINARIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article
...