Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Contraceptive use and contraceptive counselling interventions for women of reproductive age with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Harris, Melissa L; Feyissa, Tesfaye R; Bowden, Nikola A; Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina; Loxton, Deborah.
Affiliation
  • Harris ML; Centre for Women's Health Research, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia. Melissa.Harris@newcastle.edu.au.
  • Feyissa TR; Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia. Melissa.Harris@newcastle.edu.au.
  • Bowden NA; Centre for Women's Health Research, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Gemzell-Danielsson K; Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Loxton D; School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
BMC Med ; 20(1): 489, 2022 12 17.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36528586
BACKGROUND: A lack of clarity exists regarding contraceptive uptake and counselling among women with cancer, despite these women having unique family planning needs. This study aimed to systematically review the available literature and produce an overall summary estimate of contraceptive use and counselling among women with cancer across the cancer care continuum. METHODS: A systematic search of articles reporting on contraceptive counselling and/or contraceptive use among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) with cancer across the cancer care continuum (e.g. diagnosis, treatment, survivorship) was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Maternity and Infant Care and Cochrane Library. Two independent reviewers conducted the data screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Qualitative synthesis and meta-analyses were conducted to summarise the key findings. RESULTS: We included 21 articles involving 3835 participants in this review. Studies varied according to the cancer population and time along the cancer care continuum it was assessed. Of the studies that reported the overall contraceptive prevalence among women diagnosed with cancer (n = 8), contraceptive use ranged from 25 to 92%. Of the four studies that focused on cancer survivors, the contraceptive prevalence ranged from 47 to 84%. When the prevalence of these studies was pooled, a crude summary prevalence of 64% (62% among women with cancer versus 68% among cancer survivors) was found. The rate of contraceptive counselling was assessed in ten studies. A pooled prevalence of 50% (44% among women with cancer versus 58% among cancer survivors) was found, with the prevalence ranging from 12 to 78% among individual studies depending on the point in the cancer care continuum that it was provided. When contraceptive counselling was provided, it was found to significantly increase contraceptive use although biases were identified in its application. CONCLUSIONS: Contraceptive counselling interventions as part of standard cancer care have the potential to not only empower women with cancer and cancer survivors to make informed choices regarding their reproductive health but also provide the ability to plan future pregnancies for times of better health.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cancer Survivors / Neoplasms Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: BMC Med Journal subject: MEDICINA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia Country of publication: Reino Unido

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cancer Survivors / Neoplasms Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: BMC Med Journal subject: MEDICINA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia Country of publication: Reino Unido