Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Consensus for the Early Identification of Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis in Portugal: a Delphi Panel.
Sá, Maria José; Basílio, Carlos; Capela, Carlos; Cerqueira, José João; Mendes, Irene; Morganho, Armando; Correia de Sá, João; Salgado, Vasco; Martins Silva, Ana; Vale, José; Sousa, Lívia.
Affiliation
  • Sá MJ; Serviço de Neurologia. Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de São João. Porto. Portugal.
  • Basílio C; Serviço de Neurologia. Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Algarve. Faro. Portugal.
  • Capela C; Serviço de Neurologia. Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central. Lisboa. Portugal.
  • Cerqueira JJ; Serviço de Neurologia. Hospital de Braga. Braga. Portugal.
  • Mendes I; Serviço de Neurologia. Hospital Garcia de Orta. Almada. Portugal.
  • Morganho A; Serviço de Neurologia. Hospital Dr. Nélio Mendonça. Funchal. Portugal.
  • Correia de Sá J; Serviço de Neurologia. Hospital de Santa Maria. Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Norte. Lisboa. Portugal.
  • Salgado V; Serviço de Neurologia. Hospital Professor Doutor Fernando Fonseca. Amadora. Portugal.
  • Martins Silva A; Serviço de Neurologia. Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto. Porto. Portugal.
  • Vale J; Serviço de Neurologia. Hospital Beatriz Ângelo. Loures. Portugal.
  • Sousa L; Serviço de Neurologia. Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra. Coimbra. Portugal.
Acta Med Port ; 36(3): 167-173, 2023 Mar 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36735763
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Multiple sclerosis is a disease with a heterogeneous evolution. The early identification of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis is a clinical challenge, which would benefit from the definition of biomarkers and diagnostic tools applicable in the transition phase from relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. We aimed to reach a Portuguese national consensus on the monitoring of patients with multiple sclerosis and on the more relevant clinical variables for the early identification of its progression. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

A Delphi panel which included eleven Portuguese Neurologists participated in two rounds of questions between July and August of 2021. In the first round, 39 questions which belonged to the functional, cognitive, imaging, biomarkers and additional evaluations were included. Questions for which no consensus was obtained in the first round (less than 80% of agreement), were appraised by the panel during the second round.

RESULTS:

The response rate was 100% in both rounds and consensus was reached for a total of 33 questions (84.6%). Consensus was reached for monitoring time, evaluation scales and clinical variables such as the degree of brain atrophy and mobility reduction, changes suggestive of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Additionally, digital devices were considered tools with potential to identify disease progression. Most questions for which no consensus was obtained referred to the cognitive assessment and the remaining referred to both functional and imaging domains.

CONCLUSION:

Consensus was obtained for the determination of the monitorization interval and for most of the clinical variables. Most questions that did not reach consensus were related with the confirmation of progression taking into account only one test/domain, reinforcing the multifactorial nature of multiple sclerosis.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive / Multiple Sclerosis Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Acta Med Port Year: 2023 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive / Multiple Sclerosis Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Acta Med Port Year: 2023 Document type: Article
...