Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
FIGO recommendations: Use of midurethral slings for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.
Lau, Hui-Hsuan; Davila, G Willy; Chen, Ying-Yu; Sartori, Marair G F; Jármy-Di Bella, Zsuzsanna I K; Tsai, Jung-Mei; Liu, Yu-Min; Su, Tsung-Hsien.
Affiliation
  • Lau HH; MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
  • Davila GW; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Chen YY; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hsinchu MacKay Memorial Hospital, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
  • Sartori MGF; MacKay Junior College of Medicine, Nursing, and Management, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Jármy-Di Bella ZIK; Center for Urogynecology and Pelvic Health, Holy Cross Medical Group, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA.
  • Tsai JM; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Liu YM; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hsinchu MacKay Memorial Hospital, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
  • Su TH; Department of Gynecology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 161(2): 367-385, 2023 May.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36786495
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a global problem. It can significantly adversely impact a woman's quality of life. The use of synthetic mesh in vaginal surgery is controversial, especially when used for pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Although negative effects have been reported, the synthetic mesh midurethral sling (MUS) is considered to be safe and effective in the surgical treatment of SUI.

OBJECTIVES:

To provide evidence-based data and recommendations for the obstetrician/gynecologist who treats women with SUI and performs or plans to perform MUS procedures.

METHODS:

Academic searches of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar articles published between 1987 and March 2020 were performed by a subgroup of the Urogynecology and Pelvic Floor Committee, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO). SELECTION CRITERIA The obtained scientific data were associated with a level of evidence according to the Oxford University Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine and GRADE Working Group system. In the absence of concrete scientific evidence, the recommendations were made via professional consensus.

RESULTS:

The FIGO Urogynecology and Pelvic Floor Committee reviewed the literature and prepared this evidence-based recommendations document for the use of MUS for women with SUI.

CONCLUSIONS:

Despite the extensive literature, there is a lack of consensus in the optimal surgical treatment of SUI. These recommendations provide a direction for surgeons to make appropriate decisions regarding management of SUI. The MUS is considered safe and effective in the treatment of SUI, based on many high-quality scientific publications and professional society recommendations. Comprehensive long-term data and systemic reviews are still needed, and these data will become increasingly important as women live longer. These recommendations will be continuously updated through future literature reviews.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Urinary Incontinence, Stress / Suburethral Slings / Pelvic Organ Prolapse Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Taiwán

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Urinary Incontinence, Stress / Suburethral Slings / Pelvic Organ Prolapse Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Taiwán