Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Augmented Reality in Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery: A Narrative Review of Available Technology.
Pierzchajlo, Noah; Stevenson, Taylor C; Huynh, Huey; Nguyen, Jimmy; Boatright, Samuel; Arya, Priya; Chakravarti, Sachiv; Mehrki, Yusuf; Brown, Nolan J; Gendreau, Julian; Lee, Seung Jin; Chen, Selby G.
Affiliation
  • Pierzchajlo N; Mercer University, School of Medicine, Savannah, GA, USA.
  • Stevenson TC; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: taylorstevenson12@gmail.com.
  • Huynh H; Mercer University, School of Medicine, Savannah, GA, USA.
  • Nguyen J; Mercer University, School of Medicine, Savannah, GA, USA.
  • Boatright S; Mercer University, School of Medicine, Savannah, GA, USA.
  • Arya P; Mercer University, School of Medicine, Savannah, GA, USA.
  • Chakravarti S; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Mehrki Y; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Brown NJ; Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA, USA.
  • Gendreau J; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins Whiting School of Engineering, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Lee SJ; Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Chen SG; Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
World Neurosurg ; 176: 35-42, 2023 Aug.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37059357
INTRODUCTION: Spine surgery has undergone significant changes in approach and technique. With the adoption of intraoperative navigation, minimally invasive spinal surgery (MISS) has arguably become the gold standard. Augmented reality (AR) has now emerged as a front-runner in anatomical visualization and narrower operative corridors. In effect, AR is poised to revolutionize surgical training and operative outcomes. Our study examines the current literature on AR-assisted MISS, synthesizes findings, and creates a narrative highlighting the history and future of AR in spine surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Relevant literature was gathered using the PubMed (Medline) database from 1975 to 2023. Pedicle screw placement models were the primary intervention in AR. These were compared to the outcomes of traditional MISS RESULTS: We found that AR devices on the market show promising clinical outcomes in preoperative training and intraoperative use. Three prominent systems were as follows: XVision, HoloLens, and ImmersiveTouch. In the studies, surgeons, residents, and medical students had opportunities to operate AR systems, showcasing their educational potential across each phase of learning. Specifically, one facet described training with cadaver models to gauge accuracy in pedicle screw placement. AR-MISS exceeded free-hand methods without unique complications or contraindications. CONCLUSIONS: While still in its infancy, AR has already proven beneficial for educational training and intraoperative MISS applications. We believe that with continued research and advancement of this technology, AR is poised to become a dominant player within the fundamentals of surgical education and MISS operative technique.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Surgery, Computer-Assisted / Pedicle Screws / Augmented Reality Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: World Neurosurg Journal subject: NEUROCIRURGIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos Country of publication: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Surgery, Computer-Assisted / Pedicle Screws / Augmented Reality Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: World Neurosurg Journal subject: NEUROCIRURGIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos Country of publication: Estados Unidos