Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Outcomes of Intramuscular Gluteal Augmentation With Implants Using Tumescent Local Anesthesia.
Trignano, Emilio; Tettamanzi, Matilde; Liperi, Corrado; Beatrici, Edoardo; Serra, Pietro Luciano; Trignano, Claudia; Rubino, Corrado.
Affiliation
  • Trignano E; Department of Surgical, Microsurgical and Medical Sciences, Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
  • Tettamanzi M; Department of Surgical, Microsurgical and Medical Sciences, Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy. tettamanzimatilde@gmail.com.
  • Liperi C; Intensive Care Unit, Emergency Department, AOU Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
  • Beatrici E; Department of Urology, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
  • Serra PL; Department of Surgical, Microsurgical and Medical Sciences, Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
  • Trignano C; Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
  • Rubino C; Department of Surgical, Microsurgical and Medical Sciences, Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Aesthetic Plast Surg ; 47(5): 1931-1938, 2023 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37069350
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Tumescent local anesthesia (TLA) describes the practice of injecting a very dilute solution of local anesthetic combined with epinephrine and sodium bicarbonate into the tissue until it becomes firm and tense to obtain local anesthesia and vasoconstriction. The use of TLA in augmentation intramuscular gluteoplasty has never been described for implants positioning. Advantages of the TLA technique include a reduction in blood loss through epinephrine-induced vasoconstriction and hydrostatic compression from the tumescent effect. We describe TLA technique for primary intramuscular gluteal augmentation, reporting our experience during the last 5 years.

METHODS:

From 2017 to 2021, 20 patients underwent bilateral primary gluteal augmentation under TLA and conscious sedation. The tumescent solution was prepared with 25 mL of 2% lidocaine, 8 mEq of sodium bicarbonate, and 1 mL of epinephrine (1 mg/1 mL) in 1000 mL of 0.9% saline solution. The solution was infiltrated with a cannula inside the gluteus maximus muscle intra-operatively.

RESULTS:

The mean age of the patients was 39, 15 years. The average amount of tumescent solution infiltrated was 240 mL per gluteus. Operating time was 1 h and 40 min, and recovery room time averaged 240 min. Major surgery-related complications were found in 15% of patients (2 hematomas and 1 seroma) and minor complications were described in a total of 8 patients (4 wound dehiscence and 1 dystrophic scar formation). No signs of adrenaline nor lidocaine toxicity were reported and conversion to general anesthesia was never required.

CONCLUSIONS:

The tumescent local anesthesia technique represents a safe and efficacious technique for performing gluteal augmentation surgery with an intramuscular implant positioning. The advantages of this technique are safety, reasonable pain control during and after surgery and a low incidence of postoperative side effects due to general anesthesia avoidance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Sodium Bicarbonate / Anesthesia, Local Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Aesthetic Plast Surg Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Italia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Sodium Bicarbonate / Anesthesia, Local Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Aesthetic Plast Surg Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Italia