Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
ICS-SUFU standard: Theory, terms, and recommendations for pressure-flow studies performance, analysis, and reporting. Part 1: Background theory and practice.
Rosier, Peter F W M; Valdevenito, Juan P; Smith, Phillip; Sinha, Sanjay; Speich, John; Gammie, Andrew.
Affiliation
  • Rosier PFWM; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Valdevenito JP; Department of Urology, Hospital Clinico Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
  • Smith P; Department of Surgery, UConn Health School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
  • Sinha S; Department of Urology, Apollo Hospital, Hyderabad, India.
  • Speich J; Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
  • Gammie A; Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, UK.
Neurourol Urodyn ; 42(8): 1590-1602, 2023 Nov.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37096828
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

The working group (WG) initiated by the International Continence Society Standardization Steering Committee and supported by the Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction has revised the (1997) ICS Standard for pressure flow studies.

METHODS:

Based on the ICS standard for developing evidence-based standards, the WG developed this new ICS standard in the period from May 2020 to December 2022. A draft was posted on the ICS website in January 2023 to facilitate public discussion and the comments received have been incorporated into this final release.

RESULTS:

The WG summarizes the theory and recommends the practice and the terms used for the diagnosis of voiding dysfunction for adult female and male patients without relevant neurological abnormalities, in part 1 of this standard. The WG has also recommended standard principles and parameters for objective and continuous grading of urethral resistance and detrusor voiding contraction on the basis of pressure flow studies in part 2. The recommendations for practice in this part have also the aim to increase the understanding of the physiology as well as the psychology of voiding. The potential effects of the laboratory situation of the test on the voiding as well as the role of the urodynamicist in this regard are discussed. The WG has recommended to use for diagnosis only the voidings that are considered representative by the patient.

CONCLUSION:

A pressure flow study is the gold standard to assess voiding function and to quantify dysfunction. This part of the standard explains the clinical background, gives recommendations for the execution of a pressure flow study and lists relevant terms, parameters, and units of measurements.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Urination / Urinary Bladder Diseases Type of study: Guideline Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Países Bajos Publication country: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Urination / Urinary Bladder Diseases Type of study: Guideline Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Países Bajos Publication country: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA