Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions in nine fields of activity to decrease SARS-CoV-2 transmission (Spain, September 2020-May 2021).
Barbeito, Inés; Precioso, Daniel; Sierra, María José; Vegas-Azcárate, Susana; Fernández Balbuena, Sonia; Vitoriano, Begoña; Goméz-Ullate, David; Cao, Ricardo; Monge, Susana.
Affiliation
  • Barbeito I; Research Centre for Communication and Information Technology (CITIC), University of A Coruña (UDC), Galicia, Spain.
  • Precioso D; Department of Informatics Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Cádiz, Andalusia, Spain.
  • Sierra MJ; Centre for the Coordination of Health Alerts and Emergencies, Ministry of Health, Madrid, Spain.
  • Vegas-Azcárate S; CIBER Infectious Diseases, Madrid, Spain.
  • Fernández Balbuena S; Ministry of Economic Affairs and Digital Transformation, Madrid, Spain.
  • Vitoriano B; Centre for the Coordination of Health Alerts and Emergencies, Ministry of Health, Madrid, Spain.
  • Goméz-Ullate D; Institute of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain.
  • Cao R; Department of Informatics Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Cádiz, Andalusia, Spain.
  • Monge S; School of Science and Technology, IE University, Madrid, Spain.
Front Public Health ; 11: 1061331, 2023.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37124826
ABSTRACT

Background:

We estimated the association between the level of restriction in nine different fields of activity and SARS-CoV-2 transmissibility in Spain, from 15 September 2020 to 9 May 2021.

Methods:

A stringency index (0-1) was created for each Spanish province (n = 50) daily. A hierarchical multiplicative model was fitted. The median of coefficients across provinces (95% bootstrap confidence intervals) quantified the effect of increasing one standard deviation in the stringency index over the logarithmic return of the weekly percentage variation of the 7-days SARS-CoV-2 cumulative incidence, lagged 12 days.

Results:

Overall, increasing restrictions reduced SARS-CoV-2 transmission by 22% (RR = 0.78; one-sided 95%CI 0, 0.82) in 1 week, with highest effects for culture and leisure 14% (0.86; 0, 0.98), social distancing 13% (0.87; 0, 0.95), indoor restaurants 10% (0.90; 0, 0.95) and indoor sports 6% (0.94; 0, 0.98). In a reduced model with seven fields, culture and leisure no longer had a significant effect while ceremonies decreased transmission by 5% (0.95; 0, 0.96). Models R 2 was around 70%.

Conclusion:

Increased restrictions decreased COVID-19 transmission. Limitations include remaining collinearity between fields, and somewhat artificial quantification of qualitative restrictions, so the exact attribution of the effect to specific areas must be done with caution.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Qualitative_research Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Front Public Health Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: España

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Qualitative_research Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Front Public Health Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: España