Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Measurement Instruments for Integration within Children and Young People Healthcare Systems and Networks: A Rapid Review of the International Literature.
Dedat, Zainab; Hope, Steven; Hargreaves, Dougal; Lloyd-Houldey, Oliver; Nicholls, Dasha; Scott, Steph; Stepanova, Evgenia; Summerbell, Carolyn; Viner, Russell M; Hillier-Brown, Frances.
Affiliation
  • Dedat Z; Population, Policy & Practice Research & Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond St. Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
  • Hope S; Population, Policy & Practice Research & Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond St. Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
  • Hargreaves D; Mohn Centre for Children's Health & Wellbeing, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, UK.
  • Lloyd-Houldey O; Population, Policy & Practice Research & Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond St. Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
  • Nicholls D; Division of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, UK.
  • Scott S; Fuse -Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, UK.
  • Stepanova E; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, UK.
  • Summerbell C; Fuse -Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, UK.
  • Viner RM; Department of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Durham University, UK.
  • Hillier-Brown F; Fuse -Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, UK.
Int J Integr Care ; 23(2): 18, 2023.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37250761
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Robust measures of integration are essential for assessment of the development, design and implementation of integration within healthcare systems. This review aimed to identify measurement instruments for integration within children and young people's (CYP) healthcare systems (PROSPERO registration number CRD42021235383).

Methods:

We searched electronic databases (PubMED and Ovid Embase) using three main concepts '(integrated care) AND (child population) AND (measurement)', along with additional searches.

Results:

Fifteen studies describing 16 measurement instruments were eligible for inclusion. The majority of studies were conducted in the USA. There was a diversity of health conditions included in the studies. The most frequent type of assessment used was a questionnaire (11 identified), but interviews, patient data and healthcare records, and focus groups were also used. Integration outcomes assessed were quality of care coordination, quality of collaboration, continuity of care, completeness of care, structure of care, quality of communication, and local implementation of integrated care.

Conclusion:

A variety of instruments for the measurement of integration within CYP healthcare systems were identified. Further work on the standardisation of integrated care measures would be valuable; however, it is important that instruments and measures meet the needs of specific settings, populations and conditions being studied.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Language: En Journal: Int J Integr Care Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Reino Unido

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Language: En Journal: Int J Integr Care Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Reino Unido