Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is central repair with coronary artery bypass grafting enough for multi-organ malperfusion in acute type A aortic dissection with coronary malperfusion?
Minamidate, Naoshi; Wakisaka, Hodaka; Hachiro, Kohei; Miyashita, Fumihiro; Morimoto, Masanori; Kondo, Yasuo; Enomoto, Masahide; Takashima, Noriyuki; Suzuki, Tomoaki.
Affiliation
  • Minamidate N; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiga, Japan. Electronic address: naoshi.minamidate@gmail.com.
  • Wakisaka H; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiga, Japan.
  • Hachiro K; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiga, Japan.
  • Miyashita F; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiga, Japan.
  • Morimoto M; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiga, Japan.
  • Kondo Y; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiga, Japan.
  • Enomoto M; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiga, Japan.
  • Takashima N; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiga, Japan.
  • Suzuki T; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiga, Japan.
Asian J Surg ; 46(12): 5449-5453, 2023 Dec.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37311670
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Acute type A aortic dissection with coronary malperfusion syndrome is rare but associated with high mortality. Multi-organ malperfusion is an independent predictor of acute type A aortic dissection. Coronary malperfusion requires treatment, but it is not feasible to treat all malperfusions. The adequacy of "central repair and coronary artery bypass grafting" for patients with coronary and other organ malperfusion is unknown.

METHODS:

Of the 299 patients who underwent surgery between 2008 and 2018, 21 patients with coronary malperfusion, who received cental repair with coronary artery graft bypass, were analyzed retrospectively. They were divided; into Group M (n = 13, coronary and other organ malperfusion) and Group O (n = 8, coronary malperfusion only). The patient background, surgical content, details of malperfusion, surgical mortality and morbidity, and long-term outcome were compared.

RESULTS:

There was no difference in operation time (205 ± 30 vs. 266 ± 88, p = 0.49), but the time from arrival to circulatory arrest tended to be shorter in Group M (81 vs. 134, p = 0.05). Among Group M, cerebral malperfusion was the most common at 92%. Two of the three cases with mesenteric malperfusion died. The mortality of Group M and Group O was 13% and 15% (P = 0.85), respectively. There was no difference in long-term mortality (p = 0.62).

CONCLUSIONS:

Central repair and coronary artery bypass grafting is a sufficiently acceptable treatment for patients with acute type A aortic dissection and multi-organ malperfusion, including coronary malperfusion.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aortic Aneurysm / Aortic Dissection Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Asian J Surg Year: 2023 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aortic Aneurysm / Aortic Dissection Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Asian J Surg Year: 2023 Document type: Article