Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Loneliness during the Covid-19 pandemic in Germany: Impact of social factors and polygenic risk scores on interpersonal differences in loneliness and mental health.
von Werthern, N M; Ahrens, K F; Neumann, R J; Kollmann, B; Kranz, T M; Lieb, K; Tüscher, O; Reif, A; Fiebach, C J; Plichta, M M.
Affiliation
  • von Werthern NM; Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Ahrens KF; Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Neumann RJ; Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Kollmann B; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Kranz TM; Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany.
  • Lieb K; Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Tüscher O; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Reif A; Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany.
  • Fiebach CJ; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Plichta MM; Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany.
World J Biol Psychiatry ; 24(9): 838-848, 2023 Nov.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37334645
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The outbreak of Covid-19 negatively affected mental health and increased loneliness. The subjective feeling of loneliness is influenced by genetic and social factors and has a negative impact on mental health.

METHODS:

From March 2020 to June 2021 loneliness was investigated in N = 517 individuals using monthly acquired questionnaire data and Latent Growth Curve Analysis. Associations of social factors and polygenic risk scores (PRSs, n = 361) with class membership were investigated.

RESULTS:

Three classes ("average", 40%; "not lonely", 38%; "elevated loneliness", 22%) were identified, that differ significantly regarding loneliness, mental dysfunction, and response to the lockdown phases. Individuals with a high PRS for neuroticism are more likely to belong to the "elevated loneliness" class, living with another person is a protective factor.

CONCLUSION:

As the "elevated loneliness" class was at the highest risk of mental dysfunction, our findings underscore the importance of identifying those individuals to implement counteractive measures.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Mental Health / COVID-19 Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Equity_inequality / Patient_preference Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: World J Biol Psychiatry Journal subject: PSIQUIATRIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Alemania

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Mental Health / COVID-19 Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Equity_inequality / Patient_preference Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: World J Biol Psychiatry Journal subject: PSIQUIATRIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Alemania