Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Expected motor function change following decompressive surgery for spinal metastatic disease.
Okai, Bernard K; Lipinski, Lindsay J; Ghannam, Moleca M; Fabiano, Andrew J.
Affiliation
  • Okai BK; Department of Neuro-Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm & Carlton St, Buffalo, NY, 14263, United States.
  • Lipinski LJ; Department of Neurosurgery, University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, 955 Main St, Buffalo, NY, 14203, United States.
  • Ghannam MM; Department of Neuro-Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm & Carlton St, Buffalo, NY, 14263, United States.
  • Fabiano AJ; Department of Neurosurgery, University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, 955 Main St, Buffalo, NY, 14203, United States.
N Am Spine Soc J ; 15: 100240, 2023 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37457395
ABSTRACT

Background:

Motor function in patients with spinal metastatic disease (SMD) directly impacts a patient's ability to receive systemic therapy and overall survival. Spine surgeons may be in the challenging position to advise a patient on expected motor function outcomes and determine a patient's suitability as a surgical candidate. We present this study to provide this critical information on anticipated motor function change to spine surgeons.

Methods:

Consecutive patients undergoing spinal surgery for SMD at a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer institute were prospectively enrolled. Patient motor function status before and after surgery was assessed using the standard 0 to 5 five-point muscle strength grading scale. The difference in presurgical and postsurgical motor function (proximal and distal) was used to assess motor function changes following surgery.

Results:

A total of 171 patients were included. The mean age was 62.7±10.46 years and 40.9% (70) were female. Common primary malignancy types were lung (49), kidney (28), breast (25), and prostate (23). The average proximal and distal motor function difference was 0.38 (standard deviation=1.02, p<.0001) and 0.32 (standard deviation=0.91, p<.0001) respectively showing an improvement following surgery. Patients with proximal presurgical motor function of 2, 3, and 4 had an improved motor function in 73%, 77%, and 73% of the patients. Patients with distal presurgical motor function of 2, 3, and 4 had an improved motor function in 80%, 89%, and 70% of the patients.

Conclusions:

Most patients undergoing surgery for SMD have a modest improvement in motor function following surgery. The degree of improvement in most instances is less than 1 point on a 0 to 5 motor function scale. This is critical knowledge for a spinal surgeon when evaluating SMD patients with significant preoperative motor function deficits. These results aid spinal surgeons in setting expectations and evaluating the need for rapid spinal decompression.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: N Am Spine Soc J Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: N Am Spine Soc J Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos
...