Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Parent-Reported Clinical Utility of Pediatric Genomic Sequencing.
Smith, Hadley Stevens; Ferket, Bart S; Gelb, Bruce D; Hindorff, Lucia; Ferar, Kathleen D; Norton, Mary E; Sahin-Hodoglugil, Nuriye; Slavotinek, Anne; Lich, Kristen Hasmiller; Berg, Jonathan S; Russell, Heidi V.
Affiliation
  • Smith HS; Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy.
  • Ferket BS; Precision Medicine Translational Research (PROMoTeR) Center, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Gelb BD; Institute for Healthcare Delivery Science, Department of Population Health Science and Policy.
  • Hindorff L; Mindich Child Health and Development Institute, Departments of Pediatrics and Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
  • Ferar KD; Mindich Child Health and Development Institute, Departments of Pediatrics and Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
  • Norton ME; Training, Diversity and Health Equity Office, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Sahin-Hodoglugil N; Division of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
  • Slavotinek A; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Lich KH; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Berg JS; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Russell HV; Departments of Health Policy and Management.
Pediatrics ; 152(2)2023 08 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37470118
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES:

Genomic sequencing (GS) is increasingly used for diagnostic evaluation, yet follow-up care is not well understood. We assessed clinicians' recommendations after GS, parent-reported follow-up, and actions parents initiated in response to learning their child's GS results.

METHODS:

We surveyed parents of children who received GS through the Clinical Sequencing Evidence Generating Research consortium ∼5 to 7 months after return of results. We compared the proportion of parents who reported discussing their child's result with a clinician, clinicians' recommendations, and parents' follow-up actions by GS result type using χ2 tests.

RESULTS:

A total of 1188 respondents completed survey measures on recommended medical actions (n = 1187) and/or parent-initiated actions (n = 913). Most parents who completed recommended medical actions questions (n = 833, 70.3%) reported having discussed their child's GS results with clinicians. Clinicians made recommendations to change current care for patients with positive GS results (n = 79, 39.1%) more frequently than for those with inconclusive (n = 31, 12.4%) or negative results (n = 44, 11.9%; P < .001). Many parents discussed (n = 152 completed, n = 135 planned) implications of GS results for future pregnancies with a clinician. Aside from clinical recommendations, 13.0% (n = 119) of parents initiated changes to their child's health or lifestyle.

CONCLUSIONS:

In diverse pediatric clinical contexts, GS results can lead to recommendations for follow-up care, but they likely do not prompt large increases in the quantity of care received.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Parents / Life Style Type of study: Guideline Limits: Child / Humans Language: En Journal: Pediatrics Year: 2023 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Parents / Life Style Type of study: Guideline Limits: Child / Humans Language: En Journal: Pediatrics Year: 2023 Document type: Article
...