Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Translated article] Tumor ablation and vertebral augmentation in the treatment of vertebral metastases: A multicenter study.
Alfonso, M; Llombart, R; Gil, L; Martinez, I; Rodríguez, C; Álvarez, L; Gallego, J.
Affiliation
  • Alfonso M; Departamento de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain. Electronic address: malfonsool@unav.es.
  • Llombart R; Departamento de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
  • Gil L; Departamento de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
  • Martinez I; Departamento de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
  • Rodríguez C; Neurorradiologia Intervencionista, Grupo Quirón Hospitales, Madrid, Spain.
  • Álvarez L; Departamento de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain.
  • Gallego J; Departamento de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain.
Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol ; 67(6): S480-S486, 2023.
Article in En, Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37541348
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Treatment of metastatic vertebral fractures without neural compression is performed with percutaneous cementation techniques. The increase in intratumoral pressure by these techniques can send tumor cells into the bloodstream. To prevent this dissemination and improve pain treatment, ablation techniques have been introduced that would allow the creation of a cavity in the tumor prior to cementation or directly necrosing the metastasis when its size is small.

MATERIAL:

We present the experience with ablation of two hospitals and two different ablation techniques. The first group used radiofrequency ablation (A) in 14 patients (26 vertebrae), 4 of whom underwent vertebral arthrodesis. The second group used microwave ablation (B) in 93 patients (129 lesions) without associated vertebral instrumentation.

RESULTS:

In group A pain improvement in VAS was 7.7-2.6 at 6 weeks. There were no complications derived from the ablation. In most cases cementation was associated. In the group B pain improvement in VAS went from 6.8 to 1.7 at 6 weeks. Cementation was associated in all cases. There were no complications derived from the ablation.

CONCLUSION:

The association of ablation techniques with vertebral cementation is a safe technique that significantly improves the patient's pain and can help control the disease.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials Language: En / Es Journal: Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol Year: 2023 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials Language: En / Es Journal: Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol Year: 2023 Document type: Article