Quality of life and psychological evaluation of patients after anaplastology.

ABSTRACT

A comprehensive questionnaire with 43 questions was designed to evaluate quality of life, based on rehabilitation with a facial prosthesis. Each patient's psychological situation was assessed using the validated questionnaire and associated scales. Different patient groups were compared with each other in terms of questionnaire scores and general data. In total, 76 patients with a prosthesis of the orbit, nose, or ear, or a combination thereof, were included. There was a highly significant difference in overall satisfaction with defect reconstruction via a prosthesis of the ear compared with the orbit and nose (F(3) = 6.511, p = 0.001). Patients with congenital defects showed a significantly higher level of general satisfaction compared with patients with acquired defects (F(2) = 5.795, p = 0.001). Patients who returned to work were significantly more satisfied with their quality of life (T(57) = 2.626, p = 0.011). With regard to improvements to the state-of-the-art prostheses, the majority of patients suggested better retention, more durable colors, make-up possibilities, less noticeable margins, softer materials, and a movable orbital prosthesis. Within the limitations of the study it seems that facial epitheses improved mental wellbeing and increased quality of life among patients with facial defects. Multiple factors, such as type of facial defect, location of residence, and education can have a potential influence on the quality of life of affected patients. However, further studies are needed, since the psychological and social challenges remain.