Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Trends of liposomal bupivacaine utilization in major lower extremity total joint arthroplasty in the USA: a population-based study.
Stundner, Ottokar; Hoerner, Elisabeth; Zhong, Haoyan; Poeran, Jashvant; Liu, Jiabin; Illescas, Alex; Memtsoudis, Stavros G.
Affiliation
  • Stundner O; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria otto.stundner@gmail.com.
  • Hoerner E; Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care Medicine, Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität, Salzburg, Austria.
  • Zhong H; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Poeran J; Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
  • Liu J; Department of Orthopaedics/Population Health Science & Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
  • Illescas A; Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
  • Memtsoudis SG; Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Reg Anesth Pain Med ; 49(2): 139-143, 2024 Feb 05.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37567594
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Liposomal bupivacaine has been marketed for the achievement of long-acting local or regional anesthesia after major lower extremity total joint arthroplasty. However, it is comparatively expensive and controversy remains regarding its ability to decrease healthcare costs. With mounting evidence suggesting non-superiority in efficacy, compared with plain bupivacaine, we sought to investigate trends in liposomal bupivacaine use and identify changes in practice.

METHODS:

We identified adult patients from the Premier Healthcare Database who underwent elective total joint arthroplasty between 2012 and 2021. Prevalence and trends of liposomal bupivacaine utilization were compared on the individual patient and hospital levels. Log-rank tests were performed to assess the influence of location, teaching status, or hospital size on time to hospital-level liposomal bupivacaine termination.

RESULTS:

Among 103,165 total joint arthroplasty cases, liposomal bupivacaine use increased between 2012 and 2015 (from 0.4% to 22.8%) and decreased by approximately 1%-3% annually thereafter (15.7% in 2021). Liposomal bupivacaine was ever used in approximately 60% of hospitals. Hospital-level initiation of liposomal bupivacaine use peaked in 2014 and decreased thereafter (from 32.8% in 2013 to 4.3% in 2021), while termination rates increased (from 1.4% in 2014 to 9.9% in 2019). Non-teaching hospitals and those located in the South and West regions were more likely to retain liposomal bupivacaine longer than teaching or Midwest/Northeast hospitals, respectively (p=0.023 and p=0.014).

DISCUSSION:

Liposomal bupivacaine use peaked around 2015 and has been declining thereafter on individual patient and hospital levels. How these trends correlate with health outcomes and expenditures would be a strategic target for future research.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Anesthetics, Local Type of study: Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Humans Language: En Journal: Reg Anesth Pain Med Journal subject: ANESTESIOLOGIA / NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Austria

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Anesthetics, Local Type of study: Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Humans Language: En Journal: Reg Anesth Pain Med Journal subject: ANESTESIOLOGIA / NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Austria