Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The effects of topping-off instrumentation on biomechanics of sacroiliac joint after lumbosacral fusion.
Fan, Wei; Zhang, Chi; Wang, Qing-Dong; Guo, Li-Xin; Zhang, Ming.
Affiliation
  • Fan W; School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China. Electronic address: fanwei@mail.neu.edu.cn.
  • Zhang C; School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
  • Wang QD; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
  • Guo LX; School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
  • Zhang M; Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China; Research Institute for Sports Science and Technology, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Comput Biol Med ; 164: 107357, 2023 09.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37586205
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Lumbar/lumbosacral fusion supplemented with topping-off devices has been proposed with the aim of avoiding adjacent segment degeneration proximal to the fusion construct. However, it remains unclear how the biomechanics of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) are altered after topping-off surgery. The objective of this study was to investigate the biomechanical effects of topping-off instrumentation on SIJ after lumbosacral fusion.

METHODS:

The validated finite element model of an intact lumbar spine-pelvis segment was modified to simulate L5-S1 interbody fusion fixed with a pedicle screw system. An interspinous spacer, Device for Intervertebral Assisted Motion (DIAM), was used as a topping-off device and placed between interspinous processes of the L4 and L5 segments. Range of motion (ROM), von-Mises stress distribution, and ligament strain at SIJ were compared between fusion (without DIAM) and topping-off (fusion with DIAM) models under moments of four physiological motions.

RESULTS:

ROM at the left and right SIJs in the topping-off model was higher by 26.9% and 27.5% in flexion, 16.8% and 16.1% in extension, 18.8% and 15.8% in lateral bending, and 3.7% and 7.4% in axial rotation, respectively, compared to those in the fusion model. The predicted stress and strain data showed that under all physiological loads, the topping-off model exhibited higher stress and ligament strain at the SIJs than the fusion model.

CONCLUSIONS:

Motion, stress, and ligament strain at SIJ increase when supplementing lumbosacral fusion with topping-off devices, suggesting that topping-off surgery may be associated with higher risks of SIJ degeneration and pain than fusion alone.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Sacroiliac Joint / Spinal Fusion Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Comput Biol Med Year: 2023 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Sacroiliac Joint / Spinal Fusion Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Comput Biol Med Year: 2023 Document type: Article