Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What are the best methods for rapid reviews of the research evidence? A systematic review of reviews and primary studies.
Haby, Michelle M; Barreto, Jorge Otávio Maia; Kim, Jenny Yeon Hee; Peiris, Sasha; Mansilla, Cristián; Torres, Marcela; Guerrero-Magaña, Diego Emmanuel; Reveiz, Ludovic.
Affiliation
  • Haby MM; Science and Knowledge Unit, Evidence and Intelligence for Action in Health Department, Pan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Barreto JOM; Department of Chemical and Biological Sciences, University of Sonora, Hermosillo, Mexico.
  • Kim JYH; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
  • Peiris S; Fiocruz Brasília, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Brasília, Brazil.
  • Mansilla C; Science and Knowledge Unit, Evidence and Intelligence for Action in Health Department, Pan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Torres M; Science and Knowledge Unit, Evidence and Intelligence for Action in Health Department, Pan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Guerrero-Magaña DE; McMaster Health Forum, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Reveiz L; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Res Synth Methods ; 15(1): 2-20, 2024 Jan.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37696668

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Review Literature as Topic Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Language: En Journal: Res Synth Methods Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos Country of publication: Reino Unido

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Review Literature as Topic Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Language: En Journal: Res Synth Methods Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos Country of publication: Reino Unido