Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Racial/Ethnic and Gender Diversity of Orthopaedic Journal Editorial Boards.
Pujari, Amit; Johnson, Franchesca; Little, Milton T; Forsh, David A; Okike, Kanu.
Affiliation
  • Pujari A; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
  • Johnson F; University of Hawaii John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii.
  • Little MT; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
  • Forsh DA; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
  • Okike K; Hawaii Permanente Medical Group, Honolulu, Hawaii.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 106(5): 460-465, 2024 Mar 06.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37713501
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In the current era of evidence-based medicine, scientific publications play a crucial role in guiding patient care. While the lack of diversity among orthopaedic surgeons has been well documented, little is known about the diversity of orthopaedic journal editorial boards. The purpose of this study was to assess the racial/ethnic and gender diversity of U.S. orthopaedic journal editorial boards.

METHODS:

The editorial boards of 13 orthopaedic journals were examined, including 10 subspecialty and 3 general orthopaedic journals. Race/ethnicity and gender were determined for each editorial board member. The representation observed on orthopaedic journal editorial boards was compared with representation at other phases of the orthopaedic pipeline, as well as within the various subspecialty fields of orthopaedics. Logistic regression and t tests were used to evaluate these comparisons.

RESULTS:

We identified 876 editorial board members of the 13 journals; 14.0% were Asian, 1.9% were Black, 1.9% were Hispanic, 2.4% were multiracial/other, and 79.7% were White. Racial/ethnic representation was similar across the subspecialty fields of orthopaedics (p > 0.05). The representation of women on orthopaedic editorial boards was 7.9%, with differences in gender diversity observed across subspecialty fields (p < 0.05). Among journals in the subspecialty fields of spine and trauma, female editorial board representation was lower than expected, even after taking into account the representation of women in these subspecialty fields (2.0% versus 9.0% [p = 0.002] and 3.8% versus 10.0% [p = 0.03], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS:

In this study of 13 subspecialty and general orthopaedic journals, the representation of racial/ethnic minorities and women on editorial boards was similar to their representation in academic orthopaedics. However, these values remain low in comparison with the population of patients treated by orthopaedic surgeons. Given the importance of scientific publications in the current era of evidence-based medicine, orthopaedic journals should continue working to diversify the membership of their editorial boards.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Orthopedics Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Orthopedics Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Year: 2024 Document type: Article