Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What is the optimal timing of surgery after short-course radiotherapy for rectal cancer?
Donnelly, Solomon-Miles; Wyatt, James; Powell, Simon G; Jones, Nia; Altaf, Kiran; Ahmed, Shakil.
Affiliation
  • Donnelly SM; The University of Liverpool, L69 3BX, United Kingdom.
  • Wyatt J; The University of Liverpool, L69 3BX, United Kingdom; Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, L7 8XP, United Kingdom. Electronic address: james.wyatt@liverpool.ac.uk.
  • Powell SG; The University of Liverpool, L69 3BX, United Kingdom; Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, L7 8XP, United Kingdom.
  • Jones N; Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, L7 8XP, United Kingdom.
  • Altaf K; Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, L7 8XP, United Kingdom.
  • Ahmed S; Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, L7 8XP, United Kingdom.
Surg Oncol ; 51: 101992, 2023 Dec.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37757518
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Short-course neoadjuvant radiotherapy is a valuable tool in managing rectal cancers and has improved local recurrence rates. However, limited and conflicting data has resulted in variable usage and a lack of consensus on the optimal timing of surgery following short-course radiotherapy. This review aims to provide a contemporary summation of the available evidence regarding the optimal time interval between short-course neoadjuvant radiotherapy and surgery.

METHODS:

A focused literature search was undertaken using the PubMed and Embase databases from January 1980 until January 2023. Randomised control trials, large observational studies and systematic reviews focusing on the use of short-course preoperative radiotherapy for localised rectal cancers, with a focus on the timing of surgery, were included. Primary outcomes were overall survival, disease-free survival and perioperative complications.

RESULTS:

Five randomised control trials, two meta-analyses, and two large, population-based studies were included for their eligibility and relevance. Increased downstaging and fewer postoperative complications are demonstrated in patients receiving delayed surgery (> four weeks), but more recent data raise concerns regarding increased rates of local recurrence in this cohort. Studies directly comparing different time intervals to surgery following short-course radiotherapy have failed to demonstrate an effect on overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS:

This review highlights the complexities and relative shortcomings of the available data with few high-quality studies and randomised control trials directly comparing different time intervals to surgery following short-course radiotherapy. Continuing research is needed to confirm existing findings and explore gaps in the current literature.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Rectal Neoplasms Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Surg Oncol Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Reino Unido Publication country: HOLANDA / HOLLAND / NETHERLANDS / NL / PAISES BAJOS / THE NETHERLANDS

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Rectal Neoplasms Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Surg Oncol Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Reino Unido Publication country: HOLANDA / HOLLAND / NETHERLANDS / NL / PAISES BAJOS / THE NETHERLANDS