Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The effect of embryo selection using time-lapse monitoring on IVF/ICSI outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Jiang, Yanbiao; Wang, Liyan; Wang, Sha; Shen, Haofei; Wang, Bin; Zheng, Jianxiu; Yang, Jinwei; Ma, Bin; Zhang, Xuehong.
Affiliation
  • Jiang Y; The First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.
  • Wang L; The First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.
  • Wang S; The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.
  • Shen H; Key Laboratory for Reproductive Medicine and Embryo of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.
  • Wang B; The First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.
  • Zheng J; The First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.
  • Yang J; The First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.
  • Ma B; The First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.
  • Zhang X; Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child-care Hospital (Gansu Province Central Hospital), Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 49(12): 2792-2803, 2023 Dec.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37778750
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To explore the effect of embryo selection using the time-lapse monitoring (TLM) system compared with conventional morphological selection (CMS) on in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) outcomes.

METHODS:

We searched PubMed, Ovid-Embase, and The Cochrane Library for the following studies At Comparison 1, embryo selection using TLM images in a TLM incubator based on morphology versus embryo selection using CMS in a conventional incubator based on morphology; at Comparison 2, embryo selection using TLM based on morphokinetics versus embryo selection using CMS based on morphology. The primary outcomes were the live birth rate (LBR), ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and implantation rate (IR), and the secondary outcome was the miscarriage rate (MR).

RESULTS:

A total of 14 randomized control trials (RCTs) were included. Both based on morphology, TLM incubators increased the IR (risk ratio [RR] 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01, 1.18; I2 = 0%, moderate-quality evidence) compared to conventional incubators. Low- to moderate-quality evidence suggests that TLM incubators did not improve LBR, OPR, CPR, and MR compared to conventional incubators. In addition, low- to moderate-quality evidence indicates that embryo selection using TLM based on morphokinetics did not improve LBR, OPR, CPR, IR, or MR compared to CMS based on morphology.

CONCLUSIONS:

Low- to moderate-quality evidence suggests that neither TLM incubators nor embryo selection using TLM based on morphokinetics improved clinical outcomes (LBR, OPR, CPR, and MR) compared with CMS based on morphology. TLM is still an investigational procedure for IVF/ICSI practice.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Abortion, Spontaneous / Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic Type of study: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: J Obstet Gynaecol Res Journal subject: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Abortion, Spontaneous / Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic Type of study: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: J Obstet Gynaecol Res Journal subject: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article